"Justin Fields should have gone #2"
where's rumply s boy Ben, tell him for me he knows jack shit and should subscribe to me if he wants to learn something
l'm starting to think > Do we actually need to get Horne with Pick#1...Maybe do a swap with Adelaide and with their first pick " if its #2" get Gallaghan plus another pick high enough to get " Rachelle plus a player, maybe Fogarty or Himmelburg...If they want Horne that much we might be able...
l would like either....Choice #1" end up with Kelly FA, Horne, Weideman or Lynch (Ade) , Rachelle if we miss out on pick #1
Choice #2" " " " Kelly FA, Callaghan, Weideman or Lynch (Ade), Rachelle
Interesting. We do it by attributes over "this guy takes the #1 and this guy the #2" more than anything else. Stewart probably takes Lobb this week and then will probably take Larkey next week, whereas Francis will take Taberner and then Campbell/Xerri
I'm not denying you said Fields was your #2. Just saying it's easy to jump back on the "he's the clear #2" bandwagon after yesterday's game.
Im not sold on Lance. Prefer Mac Jones myself. But I like the upside.
...always frees from teams between 5th-8th tier)
or pre-season friendlies (we won one of our games in the 90th minute with a goal by "#14, trialist #2")
Will wait until the season kicks off to get fully into it (still a few weeks away) and support the boys fully.
I just hope we make it to the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.