- Jun 13, 2018
- 14,543
- 39,796
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Inter Milan, Real Madrid
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All the talk is moot. 34 players are convicted PED cheats, and that is the only fact that counts
I think that was the point, just because you're a kid and trusting, you don't get let off. Tough rules but tough shit.Of course that's true.
But we can get more of an insight into how these events unfolded, who was truly responsible and the structure (or lack of) at Ess that allowed this to happen. Two of my kids are in their early 20s and they come home from work with some disturbing stories about what their managers did and how they've often felt (because they're kids) that they just did what they were told. Nothing like Ess but I can see how the players can be totally trusting and naive.
I think that was the point, just because you're a kid and trusting, you don't get let off. Tough rules but tough s**t.
Its the only way to stop cheats using the same excuse. The only exemption was being drugged while unconscious.
You should look up the Milgram experiment. Basically it showed that with very neutral prompting from people we consider "in charge" most people will easily kill another person.Of course that's true.
But we can get more of an insight into how these events unfolded, who was truly responsible and the structure (or lack of) at Ess that allowed this to happen. Two of my kids are in their early 20s and they come home from work with some disturbing stories about what their managers did and how they've often felt (because they're kids) that they just did what they were told. Nothing like Ess but I can see how the players can be totally trusting and naive.
With reading the books, This appears to be close to what I thought had happened. Add that the club doctor was not party to decisions?Not exactly true.
He had some sympathy for the players.
No sympathy for the club as a whole.
He basically laid out the facts. It’s up to the reader to draw their own conclusions.
1)Hird wanted them bigger and stronger
2) The Weapon got Dank.
3) Dank was dodgy as f
4) Hird wanted it legal but cutting edge
5) Players were told it was legit
6) Players, when asked by random testers, did NOT disclose they’d taken anything
7) Demetriou tipped off Evans. Evans told Hird not to tell anyone. Hence they fell out
8) Demetriou left it to Gil to try to negotiate with ASADA to get players off.
9) Gil and Little pressured Hird to take the deal to end it
10) Players initially got off but then WADA jumped in and they were found guilty. No one tested positive to anything.
There’s plenty more and I may have missed a lot of important facts.
IMO the players thought they weren’t cheating but kept what they were doing secret. Dank, Weapon we’re dodgy and were involved with some very ordinary people.
Remember this all started because the Feds were monitoring organised crime and it’s potential to compromise athletes and rig sporting events.
I recommend anyone who has an opinion on this matter to read both books. They will round out your knowledge of the issue.
You should look up the Milgram experiment. Basically it showed that with very neutral prompting from people we consider "in charge" most people will easily kill another person.
The biggest question is why the players didn't confide anything to their management once the NDA's got thrown infront of them. You would think that one of the jobs they should offer for their cut was to help players before they sign anything.
I agree. The non disclosure by the players is the thing that just doesn't add up for me. It's what sways me against them being completely innocent.
It beggars belief that a few of them didn't discuss with their manager/mum/dad/DocReid. But maybe they did and everyone bought the "it's all approved by WADA" line from Dank.
For reference from the book, he was at training one night waving around pieces of paper and announcing it all to be approved by WADA.
What was approved? Maybe something they didn't even take. Thymosin...or Beta4???
I agree. The non disclosure by the players is the thing that just doesn't add up for me. It's what sways me against them being completely innocent.
It beggars belief that a few of them didn't discuss with their manager/mum/dad/DocReid. But maybe they did and everyone bought the "it's all approved by WADA" line from Dank.
For reference from the book, he was at training one night waving around pieces of paper and announcing it all to be approved by WADA.
What was approved? Maybe something they didn't even take. Thymosin...or Beta4???
I place a large slice of the blame on the senior players.I'm not saying it's an excuse.
Just that I can see how it played out. Management were deplorable.
To put it another way, the players wouldn't have done it without it being pushed hard at them by Weapon/Dank, who the players thought were fully empowered by Hird. Hird/Reid/Thompson/Corcoran/Goodwin/Wellman etc all should've been aware and all should've stopped it at the beginning.
For them to claim to be unaware or uninformed of exactly what was being injected is the disgraceful aspect of this.
Reckon he will win too
So he should.Reckon he will win too
I place a large slice of the blame on the senior players.
They had to lead the way on behalf of the playing group. If they chose not to go ahead with being taken off site and injected, it's not likely the club would've suspended them. I feel for the younger players whose careers rested on doing what they were asked.
And poor old Jobe still crying about his Brownlow - weak campaigner!!
Just imagine being an 18yo, pick 60 in the draft trying to fit in and establish some credibility and a career and you’ve got Hird, Watson, Heppell, Fletcher and co. telling you that it’s all ok.Of course that's true.
But we can get more of an insight into how these events unfolded, who was truly responsible and the structure (or lack of) at Ess that allowed this to happen. Two of my kids are in their early 20s and they come home from work with some disturbing stories about what their managers did and how they've often felt (because they're kids) that they just did what they were told. Nothing like Ess but I can see how the players can be totally trusting and naive.
Of course that's true.
But we can get more of an insight into how these events unfolded, who was truly responsible and the structure (or lack of) at Ess that allowed this to happen. Two of my kids are in their early 20s and they come home from work with some disturbing stories about what their managers did and how they've often felt (because they're kids) that they just did what they were told. Nothing like Ess but I can see how the players can be totally trusting and naive.
What did they take that was actually banned?Not exactly true.
He had some sympathy for the players.
No sympathy for the club as a whole.
He basically laid out the facts. It’s up to the reader to draw their own conclusions.
1)Hird wanted them bigger and stronger
2) The Weapon got Dank.
3) Dank was dodgy as f
4) Hird wanted it legal but cutting edge
5) Players were told it was legit
6) Players, when asked by random testers, did NOT disclose they’d taken anything
7) Demetriou tipped off Evans. Evans told Hird not to tell anyone. Hence they fell out
8) Demetriou left it to Gil to try to negotiate with ASADA to get players off.
9) Gil and Little pressured Hird to take the deal to end it
10) Players initially got off but then WADA jumped in and they were found guilty. No one tested positive to anything.
There’s plenty more and I may have missed a lot of important facts.
IMO the players thought they weren’t cheating but kept what they were doing secret. Dank, Weapon we’re dodgy and were involved with some very ordinary people.
Remember this all started because the Feds were monitoring organised crime and it’s potential to compromise athletes and rig sporting events.
I recommend anyone who has an opinion on this matter to read both books. They will round out your knowledge of the issue.
Weren't the bombers players told the injections were vitamins? If so I'm surprised no player took legal action. Very hefty penalties (including jail) for doing shit like that.Its the only way to stop cheats using the same excuse. The only exemption was being drugged while unconscious.
So many ? marks over certain teams that hasn't been explored or more to the point swept under the carpet.What did they take that was actually banned?
How was it different to what Dank supplied Geelong when the Weapon was there?
The gear that Ben Cousins was on when he won his Brownlow was way more performance enhancing, could make a fat 50 year old dance for 4 days lol
I place a large slice of the blame on the senior players.
They had to lead the way on behalf of the playing group. If they chose not to go ahead with being taken off site and injected, it's not likely the club would've suspended them. I feel for the younger players whose careers rested on doing what they were asked.
And poor old Jobe still crying about his Brownlow - weak campaigner!!
He may have had a thing about needles but according to ChipLe Grand's "Straight Dope" page 87 he takes his sus drugs in a rub on cream form...IIRC Zaharakis refused all jabs because he hated needles. I don’t think the club suspended him. I agree about the younger players, probably thought they couldn’t say no.