Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Serious challenger for mark of the century too. You know it’s coming.Langers was a serious talent cut down in his prime. Was awesome in the 2018 GF.
AJ has a higher ceiling. Could honestly see him having a 15 mark, 8 goal game at some point this season.
Lol @ multiple Richmond nuffies saying it should've been a free kick against Magic Johnson
I don’t think I can ever agree with you on this. I don’t like messing with a successful defensive structure unless it’s to improve it.Not sure if he's that inexperienced in the role. Wasn't he a forward ruck for the first 7 years on AFL lists?
At least he's got the body for the ruck contest and should be decent dropping back into defence.
I just think we can cover him in defence.
It's definitely not ideal for Frampton, as he needs experience in our system, but I think it's the best thing for the team for a couple of weeks until Cox returns. Also gives us a chance to run a different defence, which we might need to later on as we can't assume that our talls will remain fit.
It's not really structure it's personnel - one player. And I'm advocating the personnel that kicked arse in the second half against Geelong, so it's not exactly experimental.I don’t think I can ever agree with you on this. I don’t like messing with a successful defensive structure unless it’s to improve it.
We were lucky that Geelong insisted on playing a half fit Hawkins in round 1. The structure held without Howe for a quarter and a half, but it wasn’t exactly effective, they scored heavily against us. The last two weeks has seen our defence become a lot tighter and a lot of that has been due to having a big man in Frampton take care of the primary key forward allowing Moore and Murphy to intercept and peel off their opponents imo. Not a fan of changing that up just to halve some hitouts that can be sharked anyway.It's not really structure it's personnel - one player. And I'm advocating the personnel that kicked arse in the second half against Geelong, so it's not exactly experimental.
Geelong barely scored once Howe went off.We were lucky that Geelong insisted on playing a half fit Hawkins in round 1. The structure held without Howe for a quarter and a half, but it wasn’t exactly effective, they scored heavily against us. The last two weeks has seen our defence become a lot tighter and a lot of that has been due to having a big man in Frampton take care of the primary key forward allowing Moore and Murphy to intercept and peel off their opponents imo. Not a fan of changing that up just to halve some hitouts that can be sharked anyway.
I agree.Geelong barely scored once Howe went off.
Id do it because I wouldn't play a kid who is likely to be uncompetitive in the ruck contests and offer little around the ground, so for me it's a choice between weakening the defence or the forward line and I think we'd be weakening our defence less than using McStay in the ruck would weaken our forward line.
Don't know what choice they'll make though. I think McStay in the ruck and Reef into the forward line is the shortest odds as I think they'll want Frampton to settle into his role.
And win 11 French OpensPeople should stop worrying about Hipwood as a dangerous "tall".
He simply doesn't play tall. He's a tall, lanky medium/small.
Maynard or Quaynor could play on him and thrash him (I appreciate that one is required for a much more dangerous player in Cameron).
Interesting fact - Hipwood is the lowest rating player ever to reach 100 games.
Not sure we can cover both Hipwood and Danniher if Frampton is rucking. A big risk.I think they'll go with McStay, Johnson, Frampton stints in ruck.
Reef to come back in up forward.
If Hipwood has one of his once a year 15 minutes spurts where he can play footy, Frampton or Murphy are going to struggle or whoever is covering him. The rest of the time my nanna could cover him, and she's dead.Not sure we can cover both Hipwood and Danniher if Frampton is rucking. A big risk.
Edit: Forgot they've also got Norman up forward now. Good match for Murphy.
We were all over them in the first half, almost like the week before. Kick straight, and the final margin may have been similar as they wouldn't have had the desire they had in the 3rd.I think a lot of the “ugly” calls were referencing our kicking for goal, and the reward for effort we were extracting in the first half in particular.
All the commentary ive heard is the scoreboard flattered Richmond greatlyWe were all over them in the first half, almost like the week before. Kick straight, and the final margin may have been similar as they wouldn't have had the desire they had in the 3rd.
He was also blocked...Maynard is a legend.
We killed them in play in the first half - they had a short period of dominance to begin the third, but then we got back on top pretty quickly. In the last we basically put the queue in the rack and didn't take the game on to ensure we couldn't lose the quarter by 5 goals.All the commentary ive heard is the scoreboard flattered Richmond greatly
I think a lot of the “ugly” calls were referencing our kicking for goal, and the reward for effort we were extracting in the first half in particular.
I agree.In the first half we were as dominant as any side can be.We must have botched at least 8 goals through poor kicking,missed snap shots at goal from close in,poor decision making,like passing to players who were covered when the player should have just kicked the goal themselves.The game should have been well and truly over by half time.But we kept Richmond in it by constantly missing,and they came at us hard in the third quarter and almost hit the lead.We were all over them in the first half, almost like the week before. Kick straight, and the final margin may have been similar as they wouldn't have had the desire they had in the 3rd.
We were lucky that Geelong insisted on playing a half fit Hawkins in round 1. The structure held without Howe for a quarter and a half, but it wasn’t exactly effective, they scored heavily against us. The last two weeks has seen our defence become a lot tighter and a lot of that has been due to having a big man in Frampton take care of the primary key forward allowing Moore and Murphy to intercept and peel off their opponents imo. Not a fan of changing that up just to halve some hitouts that can be sharked anyway.
Richmond media mafia.All the commentary ive heard is the scoreboard flattered Richmond greatly