Id classify a "Gem" being a 200 game player. As of today that's Isaac Smith & Tim Kelly????Could this also be applied to tier 1 leagues like WAFL, SANFL ect to find that next gem?
Yes & no. I'm a firm believer that if you aren't getting the job done in the 2's then you won't be able to in a harder comp. You would need to walk into an AFL midfield instantly considering you'd have less development left and older age. So if you take state league football numbers then at AFL level you might be only 80% as effective.
Meaning you need to be a state league player going at 25% better than the entire rest of the competition. Furthermore you would generally need to have made this gap outside of the elite AFL pathway.
In addition there are reasons for why you aren't going to make it no matter how dominant you are.
Physical: Endurance, height( KPP especially), pace.
Footy: Skills, 2 way running, flourishes as #1 but struggles as the 2nd or 3rd best, style of play doesn't translate to AFL.
Personality: FIGJAM, lazy, off field issues.
Individual: Melbourne doesn't need any inside mids, WCE prefer only balanced players with pace, etc.
Most "mature age" players miss out on being drafted and then get picked up a year later, or are delisted and make it back onto a list at some point. That doesn't really count in my eyes as being a late draft gem as they are in full view of everybody and would be discussed and undrafted/delisted for whatever reason. They are also generally are low level contributors or depth types.