Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

 
Last edited:
Not sure. Just saw it on the AFL site.
Would be a bit odd if it was on the club board given it is clearly an opinion piece advocating for particular outcomes of a supposedly democratic board election.

The last two paragraphs:

"Solomon has been vocal in supporting the current board and Barham's presidency but is hoping to add his expertise to the mix: from his 24 years in the industry, from the business world and also in pushing to connect the supporter base with where the club sees itself placed.

Weston has called into question the culture and character of the club, saying he has not seen any change at Essendon. But the scoreboard is often the final piece to move."
 
Scott has had way more support than Truck and hasn't outperformed him

Rutten was afforded an entire wasted year prior to his coaching role to "get a feel of it".

Not only have we become more consistent/defensive and less prone to blowouts (as many analysts pointed out this year) but we've also won more.

2024 - 46
2023 - 44

2022 - 28
2021 - 44

Mind you Scott had to come in off the back of the mess Rutten left and had to do so with no year to "learn" the list.

Truck was a mindless appointment and a coach who had NFI.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

The really dumb part of Westerns comments about needing premiership experience on the board is the fact that under Brasher they had Madden and Wellman on the board and Sheedy was also on the board with them for a while.
This is 100% about those wanting Hird as coach.
His bit about culture is dumb too, the current board appointed one of the toughest blokes to play for the most physically intimidating side of the modern era. Short of giving the entire list a cement enema there's not a lot more they could have done to harden them all up.
 
I see Brasher as someone who has either gradually come around to the realisation that the way the club has been run needs to change or was simply part of a minority who were consistently overruled by the forces of Old Essendon.

I think he's been clumsy at times and certainly isn't the best possible person in the country to run the board, but I think he's a mile better than undoing a heap of progress the club has made by electing a couple of outright wreckers.

To not reappoint him is to run the very high risk that we give Scott the Rutten treatment before he's had a chance to implement some important changes. We move from a board where the majority support Vozzo and Scott and the improvements they are making to a board where that effort is undermined by a lack of support, lack of resources, or pressure to chase short to success at the expense of the longer term.
 
We need stability - the guy who organised the last board spill and further agitated for control.
When you break the wheel inevitably someone ends up at the top of the heap. That it happens to be someone who has arsed his way into doing the things that have needed doing for the last 20 years is pure luck.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Its the arrogance of the candidate statements from Solomon & Weston that really makes this whole thing stupid.

Solomon - Owner/Director of multiple business - great, like what? Fantastic you played for us & coached at a few clubs, but unless you're putting the boots back on, nobody gives a shit. This is far more of a business role, not a footy role, try demonstrate that you're at least across that.

Weston - Congrats on playing in 2 flags 40 years ago, what the hell do you know about being a board member of a business of $80mill per annum? Demonstrate that.

I'd vote for the random fan before voting for those 2.

Lots of the older cohort still romanticise Sheedy despite everything that's gone on.
 
why the actual upheaval?


iven to followed deeply all the good and bad Barham (& Co.) have done since his appointment but it feels like the club is finally going in a reasonable direction and then this

As for Paul Weston himself, where has he been for however long he's considered doing this? sounds suss to me
 
Green and Barham, easy one for me. Vozzo, McPherson, Scott and Rosa should get a few years at things without Sheedy, Dodoro and the idea of Hird lingering in the background. We only just got rid of them. No need to bring them back through Weston and Solomon. Welsh already on the board is enough of a sheedy player connection.
 
why the actual upheaval?


iven to followed deeply all the good and bad Barham (& Co.) have done since his appointment but it feels like the club is finally going in a reasonable direction and then this

As for Paul Weston himself, where has he been for however long he's considered doing this? sounds suss to me

Weston’s interview on SEN this morning was as big of a train wreck as it gets IMO. That interview did more for Barham & Green’s campaign than anything they could say themselves
 
why the actual upheaval?


iven to followed deeply all the good and bad Barham (& Co.) have done since his appointment but it feels like the club is finally going in a reasonable direction and then this

As for Paul Weston himself, where has he been for however long he's considered doing this? sounds suss to me

I assume with Sheedy out, his little cohort of allies are upset and want to fix it.
 
Weston’s interview on SEN this morning was as big of a train wreck as it gets IMO. That interview did more for Barham & Green’s campaign than anything they could say themselves
Did he give any specifics on why he is unhappy with our current setup and what his plans are?
 
One of the criticisms on Blitz was that it took 2 years for the club under Barham to remove Dodoro. There are a couple of things there - first at least it was done, it isn't easy removing someone like that with those tentacles. Second if Sheedy faction gets in there is the real possibility he is back given his current involvement with Hird and the optics that he is still involved in recruitment.
 
One of the criticisms on Blitz was that it took 2 years for the club under Barham to remove Dodoro. There are a couple of things there - first at least it was done, it isn't easy removing someone like that with those tentacles. Second if Sheedy faction gets in there is the real possibility he is back given his current involvement with Hird and the optics that he is still involved in recruitment.

so did they not see the article about Dodoro taking us to Fair Court, or what.

that is an insane critique imo. it seems perfectly reasonable to form a view that based on the events of the last ~2 years removing Dodoro was not as easy as say, sacking Matthew Knights or Ben Rutten.
 
so did they not see the article about Dodoro taking us to Fair Court, or what.

that is an insane critique imo. it seems perfectly reasonable to form a view that based on the events of the last ~2 years removing Dodoro was not as easy as say, sacking Matthew Knights or Ben Rutten.
Sheeds leaving at the same time Dodoro took leave (probably preparing his Fair Work case at that point) I think shows how deep his fangs have been embedded into the club. Not to mention his other connections and the people he had conflict with over the years getting run out of the club.
 
Did he give any specifics on why he is unhappy with our current setup and what his plans are?

It was heavily around the teams lack of development and playing groups commitment, however his only plans were to point it out & get the right people in place to address it.

The peak of the train wreck was citing the 2km time trial last week and claiming a senior player & rookie didn’t run it hard like TD used to in the 80s.

It’ll be up on the SEN podcasts, but I dare say anyone listing to that and thinking he was a viable candidate would have a very different opinion now.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top