Search results for query: *

Freo getting gift from ump, two play ons when Freo player in zone

And not the player

Didn't touch him ump

I thought 360 degree tackles are holding the ball

Every time Freo has got a dodgy free they have turned it over or kicked a point. I like their fair play

You're sounding like a pretty average human being too

Take that rot somewhere else

Maybe saints recruiters were calling him a product rather than a person

Justice shot on goal after that wasn't a free

big throw

more obvious free than the other carry on we are hearing

Have to appeal.

Time for Houston to get some cosmetic surgery to look like Burton

Yes, Houston would not have anything to answer for.

He'll definitely go to the tribunal, under 18.7.1 Spirit and Intention Players shall be protected from unreasonable conduct from an opposition Player which is likely to cause injury. But unless he got him high (not in terms of MRP), then there is no free kick to be paid. Pretty sure that's...

18.7.2 Free Kicks - Rough Conduct A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player when that Player engages in rough conduct against an opposition Player which in the circumstances is unreasonable, which includes but is not limited to: (a) (b) (c) (d) executing a dangerous tackle on an...

5 weeks to me is quite high for someone who didn't actually get him high, but if it's determined that that was an unfair bump (as it had too much force) and the new norm is that is reportable, I would not like to see 5 for a bump that wasn't high. The ball was in between players, the intent to...

Lets just all agree on that David King's MRP predictions are out 100% of the time, and then you get the media reporting it as fact. I'd take people on here as having more reasoned analysis and reporting skills.

Again, irrelevant to Houston and any suspension, take your game day synopsis to your Crows 2024 Aftermath thread

Not really related, but if we see Houston get 4, I want to see Thilthorpe get 2 for tunnelling.

You're best player is your captain by far, and should that even be in your argument. What happens if it was your worst player like Rachelle?

What would free be for? Sorry Dan that's just too hard a bump

Ump said it wasn't a free, so how is it outside the rules?

They did not end up with a free kick, take your rubbish elsewhere. The ump said it wasn't high and the continuing play seen Port mark the ball.

It's only the crows that call their supporters their customers. Maybe they can incorporate that into their new logo

Rachele ego and skill hopefully meet at some stage of his career

They were in perfect position. What would have the free been for? It wasn't high. Is this a situation where the player will be reported for a reportable offence that isn't even classified as a free?

Two umps within 5 metres of the play said to the crows it wasn't high contact when they were trying to regain control.

It definitely didn't help the umpire not paying the mark to rozee and then the mark to bergman, that essentially led to a 2 goal turn around in the first minutes of the game and caused port fans to get angry, 7 - 1 frees for Adelaide in the first, then the tunnelling incidents, i have to admit...

Your players had half a game to get him as you say, all they managed to do was stupid stuff that turned the game. It wasn't Houston's hit, it was the lack of composure of the Crows that turned the game and Rachelle went missing.