Search results for query: *

Papley listed test so maybe covering for him

Yep that's my read, feels safer at M9 than M8 at this point

What's the consensus on Sinc early, does he play defence coming off the soft tissue or stiffen up a depleted midfield? Has impact on NAS, Hugo and Box depending on how they use him.

Taking Jackson to clog up a fwd spot and sacrifice one of the 12 good fwd options just to provide cover for Flynn feels suboptimal, esp with Darcy back at Rd 4-5

I think people are expecting too much from flex, most teams have more than 1 bad score each week. I think best 18 gives solid protection in rd 2/3/4 but flex less so

Yep, he's a high priced cash cow who will score enough to be on field but too risky to play at R2 with no escape hatch. Flex allows for multiple get out options if he gets injured or when he tops out.

Garcia's role is essentially the same as Perryman. Tackle and block for the better mids with a few possessions in the process, mainly around stoppages. He'll get enough mid time but is not a player they'll be looking for in transition. He's a gun tackler with great intensity but has a restricted...

Not sure if Hewett and / or Boyd are certain, Hewett still a bit sore. Boyd may get a game or two while RoMa gets fit

Current iteration. Happy to roll with 3 of the 400ish value mids it's a nice price point to move up or down for corrections and all seem to have upside. Zorko feels like one who could get away with the early draw.

A TDK / Flynn combo frees up options everywhere but with both made of tissue paper there is literally no get out clause if one of them goes down. Think Flynn in flex looks the play

Also hinted between the lines that COS may not be there early with comments like "He's been good but there's not a lot of KPD spots etc"

I watched this interview with Scott and read this one a bit negatively tbh. He was essentially saying we only want him at CBAs with 2 other big bodies straight after saying Danger would play predominently fwd unless needed in the mids for impact.

Yep it's good. Hopefully they can add some adjustments for the reducing MN or prices will be overstated, I think they are working on it

Can't believe I'm even looking at this, peak stupidity season with the game switch. Looking at SDK Rds 15-19 last yr while rucking. With SDK going almost the same in the pre season match vs Bombers as he did rucking last yr against them, I'm confused as to why he has multiple other 90s/100s in...

ah yep cheers, same

Is anyone else having issues with player searches not appearing on DFS?

Sanders a solid option with the Dogs decimated midfield, will get a decent crack early

Garcia 2nd lowest TOG for Saints a concern

Notwithstanding he's coming off a soft tissue they really need Sinc playing midfield once he's back up to speed, think he may play more there than defence

Problem for Boyd is he can only play ruck, which means if he plays they are committed to playing RoMa 70% fwd

Boxshall massive sub risk, low TOG not a great sign for prospects

Surely no PS miles in legs and dodgy calf Bont playing 50-60% fwd. Richards likely out and Treloar out

Makes sense, my issue is I don't want 105-115 for someone I'm paying 118 for and dont feel confident captaining

Not starting Sheez for the 3rd straight season Has worked superbly first 2 yrs......:rolleyes:

Davo!

5 of first 6 will either run hard tag or put time into him, Dogs won't. Plus a bye

Daicos early draw looks very tough, with that and the bye it's hard to see him getting out of reach before trade season GWS Rd 0 then

Has been pretty durable last 2 yrs

tbf if we get another Chesser these projection are at the high end....

Gotcha. Is it fair to say if Crouch is not sub / subbed his TOG will basically be 100% CBAs, similar to last yr? He can't play anywhere else