The constitution doesn't need to be changed to wear an inverse or any form of kit
Thats the great lie they sold the public.
If the AFL said wear a tie dye jumper with 4 gold stripes on it, they would have too under the very clause they talk about
I'm fascinated by ISC's business model
They buy contracts for clubs, sell the logo position back to the club (I presume) to be on sold - but keep it across all off field merch
They went from being one of the biggest names in the league to selling off its prime Real Estate while making a...
I think we are headed towards the jumper sponsor being on the side of the jumper and a sponsor under the neck like the AFLW
I've noticed they trial a lot there before it comes in the mens - noticeably the sponsor in the goal square, full sponsored posts and the 50m arcs sponsored
It's more the principle I think
Imo I thought behind the shorts sponsors would have come in first (and been less intrusive) or double short sponsors on the front
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.