The only reason I would accept a shortened quarter is if they go the route of extra games so everyone played everyone twice.
But that wouldn't be accepted as it completely defeats of the purpose of why they want to make that change.
So to make a long answer short. No.
BrissyCrow - Rule proposal (Too late for this competition, but what about going forward?)
I propose that we introduce a rule which rules out selecting against a team under a % threshold.
I'm thinking 70%.
So with this proposal. You couldn't tip against these teams in these rounds
Opening...
Do I pump out some NCAA 13?
I looked today, I'm up to season 39 with Boise State. Only had 20 losses.
Unbeaten vs rivals
1 loss in a bowl game (vs Vanderbilt)
Every time I see a suggestion like this I just about have an aneurysm. **** off with ideas which maintain the status quo for non-victorians while consolidating Victoria.
How about this
Australian Division
Adelaide, Fremantle, Hawthorn, Carlton, Essendon
National Division
Sydney, West Coast...
I disagree with Collingwood getting the biggest leg up.
I believe that's easily Geelong. They get the advantages that both the non-victorian clubs get and the victorian clubs get.
Just thinking right now.
One of his best attributes might make him a fairly good Cornerback in the NFL.
The way he flips his hips to ensure his man doesn't beat him by going around him.
If he were 3-4 inches taller he could be a pro-bowler in the NFL.
Maybe he should give it a go? Would make...
He's almost been given North Melbourne games exclusively this year
Rd 1 - Greater Western Sydney vs North Melbourne
Rd 2 - North Melbourne vs Fremantle
Rd 4 - West Coast vs Sydney
Rd 5 - Geelong vs North Melbourne
Rd 6 - North Melbourne vs Hawthorn
Rd 8 - Richmond vs Fremantle (200th game)
Rd...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.