Search results for query: *

In my corporate life I was appointed to a State Government body. My employer (a top 50 ASX company) had donated to both sides of politics to get a seat at the table. There was a Union rep at the table,.

Its not news that some people vote twice: https://www.aec.gov.au/about_aec/Publications/Backgrounders/fraud-and-multiple-voting.htm Of course :rolleyes:, its the other lot that is cheating ......

Not sure what 'rich' campaigner voice you are eluding to - political access can be bought no matter who is in Government & the most transparent example of that is the Union movement at the ALP National Conference. Note, that is not a criticism.

Even the more reason to engage ..... Dutton was looking for a way to be relevant & Albo accommodated him.

The message from the above is that Albo chose not to engage with Dutton & answer his questions, & the yes vote has gone South ever since. The PM made a disastrous decision.

Appear to have - watch the excuses rolled out for how far many YES supporters are from the general populace. Every bit as irrelevant as the NO advocates at the SSM referendum.

Pull up a mirror.: 'Yet to see a single coherent, measured, base level of intelligence argument against the voice.' Can you see the wood for the trees ?

With due respect you are 'marking your own homework.' So busy wheeling your barrow to be dispassionate.

You should go back & read the discussion WITHOUT blinkers.

No chance I cave to your blustering attempt to cancel opinion that you dont agree with.

Really simple, that opinion supports my post as you requested. You continue to put to try to put your words in my mouth. 'That you are also claiming that The Indigenous Voice to Parliament is comparable to "South Africa’s apartheid era and it still blights Malaysia, where citizens of Indian...

I have no idea why you cannot open the link. Perhaps ask someone who might know your problem. 'Those who see the coming referendum as a question of morality are right. The legal detail is important. But even more important is the fact that this debate is about a single principle. We must all...

The poster did not express his own opinion on the issue.

Unwilling to want to debate their privately held opinion, because there are plenty of nutters out there: 'thanks, not today ' as you close the front door.

See: I am happy for you to disagree, not for you simply deny./attempt to cancel.

If thats what informs you, it shows.

Yes. See here: Australian citizenship equality is at stake in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum, writes Chris Merritt | Rule of Law Institute of Australia

Slogans are a reality in Australian politics in this era of talking points. Preaching to the rusted on is a waste of time. Denigrate people for not agreeing with you? This slogan is that powerful, nonsense. You really need to get out & talk to people who decide their vote on what they...

General thought, more like lack of thought.

Are you among the irrelevant voters by choice ?

Albo refused to answer Duttons questions - the vote has gone South from there. Own it, There is no place for a racial divide in Australian citizenship.

As usual the rusted on voters are a constant. The vote will be decided by thinking voters.

Exactly, it is your value judgement.

Nope. The hip pocket nerve does not inform my views. Things like employment & taxation (paid & collected) suggest evil is a foolish descriptor.

See the vote for the opinion of the people that change Governments.

EVIL ..... pull the other leg.

We are at the 500m mark in a 1500m race that is Albo's to lose. Duttons in the race.

The last election was won by hope that Albo/the ALP could do a better job.

Stepped up when the NO vote was 70% +. Its slipped a bit. Track her involvement v say Minister Burney. OR you can run with 'Murdoch', the excuse that you have when you need to deny/deflect ...... reality.

Given that is a value judgement of what you know & what we know about Price's life's experience to date.