Zorko even moreso IMO - 36 by the time the season starts and he was critical for them this year.
The team was 18-1-8 across the season, and in games where Zorko had 25+ touches they were 14-1-3
I don't think that's fair.
He was a senior leader in the club. Reportedly a massive financial signing and a large part of our soft cap allocation. This arguably impacted our budget for assistant coaching staff. When you absorb that much cap space there are high expectations.
I'd been a critic...
Moir is my bet. Showed some great signs and the type of player who could definately turn a few heads when he isn't just coming on as a late sub.
Smith will likely get a nomination if he plays, as top picks do have more airtime.
It's interesting to finally get some words directly from Russell himself.
What I'm struggling with is that for a guy who is supposedly starting a business aimed at mentoring high performance in senior leadership roles, he is very quick to point the finger of responsibility away from himself...
Finance costs were $1.4m
D&A were $8.9m
Of these two add backs, about $4.0m is related to leases (the aasb16 standard makes the statements misleading) and $0.3m is genuine finance costs related to pokies. So in theory you could do:
$3.0 stat profit
then add back $1.4 and $8.9
less $4.0 for...
That's a great point - we didn't experience that this year with our "AFL income" decreasing by circa $200k whilst the salary cap increased by $750k.
That being said, our higher football department spend, probably increased our soft cap contributions which would have offset some of the...
Some thought bubbles:
Revenue up materially - largely driven by increased membership and gate revenue (attendance based)
The club is not for profit, but is establishing a strong net asset position so it will be able to weather future downturns
Unfortunately we haven't been able to translate the...
The discount is fixed at 197 points for any bids after pick 18, so it would be:
We get Pick 38 (Ben Camporeale) and pick 59 (161 points)
Pick 38 (465 points) less fixed discount (197) = 268 points needed
Give Pick 40 (429) - less cost of 268 = 161 remaining - pick 40 slides to pick 59
How many of our good forwards looked like superstars when we were getting smashed in the middle and losing by 10 goals each week?
I'm not advocating for picking him up - I don't know enough about him...but judging him off this year when he played better when Richmond were better might be a...
I dont have a lot of connections to the industry, but I do know that SOS was never that close to the draftee pool. He put a lot of reliance into his scouts, and certainly had favourites.
Having 38 saves us going into deficit on the campo deals. Excluding pick three, the points value of 38, 63, 68, 69, 72 is 704 points. This is equivalent to pick 26 - and whilst there will be a discount - theres nothing stopping Lucas getting a bid later in the draft that also requires matching...
Agreed - if the draft is as deep as they are saying, then both picks are worth using rather than trading up.
One of those picks for a Houston would also be agreeable IMO - but his age diminishes his overall value in my eyes. That being said, its not too different to Saad
Yes. He'll be great for the football operations side of the business, but have no understanding of his commercial and business acumen. Might need a much more hands-on or strong president to lean into that side of the business.
I think its fair to say we've overpaid for most of our big name signings - but that's because you have to pay overs to get the other side to sign the deal. The only way to get a bargain at the trade table is to be in a 2 team town (or Geelong), and have the player nominate that they'll only...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.