Search results for query: *

The Dems could have provided direct links for people who wanted to donate, yet they didn't do that and instead provided a link they could skim off the top of. And you're here white knighting for them. Unbelievable.

It is when the dems skim off the top of all donations made to the link they posted.

Kamala had the solution to the fires alll along, using inmates as firefighters. If having a ready source of firefighting labour means violating the constitution, so be it. https://prospect.org/justice/how-kamala-harris-fought-to-keep-nonviolent-prisoners-locked-up/

My post was a parody of the sort of responses I expect in these parts.

So what you're saying is you want Trump to concentrate on the border, illegal immigrants and making America great again. Once he's achieved that what are your thoughts on his planned real estate acquisitions?

President Biden seems to be getting an early start for his new career as a comedian...

You mean the trust the science image? It's an odd choice of words for a global catch cry.

What image?

Yes I know what hypocrisy is. I also know what grifting is.

I just want to know why all these people who cry the loudest about climate change do the exact opposite of what they say needs to be done to save the planet. No chance of any meaningful action when even questioning their behaviour leads to a bunch of white knights jumping to their defense.

Is this the sort of science we are supposed to trust i.e. don't question it?

No that isn't my opinion at all, I don't know where you pulled that idea from, but I could take a guess

They could take a train, a zoom call or a regular flight. It's hard to take the climate alarmism seriously when you've got people acting like this.

You only need to look at the climate bureaucrats who fly around the world on private jets.

It's a good thing we don't have any military trained, easily manipulated posters here, especially not ones whose allegiance flip flops between the extremes of politics...

Such a ridiculous claim that anyone is cheering for it, you should be embarrassed for typing this nonsense. If you had read the article before posting it, you would have seen that these billionaires had bought Diane Feinstein and Obama also had a massive crack at getting them what they wanted.

Lol did you even read the article you posted?

First this and also the dei reversal and you think it is damaging? Trump hasn't even taken office yet and he's had an effect on the tyrants who censored free speech and institutionalized bigotry. It sounds like a win to me

Make social media great again

Facebook getting rid of fact checkers. Says election was a cultural tipping point and needs to embrace free speech. Going with twitter style community notes. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/meta-ends-fact-checking-program-community-notes-x-rcna186468

It would certainly help to balance the budget. The Canadian govt estimates government approved suicide saves $150M a year.

Instead of using botox they should have gone for the tried and true Dem remedy, adrenachrome.

I think you should edit this post, Trump might decide there won't be another election. Add a simple if/when qualifier to remind the lefties that the sky could very well fall after 4 years.

That's sort of Hunters position on the matter. He simultaneously claims that his privacy was infringed because he is the owner of the data, and that said data was manipulated and tampered with.

Goose Patrol was led to believe that the laptop was russian disinformation, and for whatever reason they can't let go of it. Probably still believes Iraq had WMDs.

Soros hates America so he has that in common with the democrats.

He was registered to some off brand political party and his ex wife dreamed of murdering Trump.

You just posted straight up misinformation. Not really surprising, from someone who just parrots the approved narrative.

He adds: “Imagine the applications of that – the compliance – for insurance companies to know that the medicines patients should take, they do”. Sure doesn't sound like he specifically means it's for the patient. No wonder no one takes fact checkers seriously. Or the people who post fact...

This one? Rated false because he isn't talking about a covid vaccine? Little wonder no one takes the fact checkers seriously. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jan/05/blog-posting/old-video-clip-pfizer-ceo-not-referring-microchips/