Search results for query: *

Where? Post it again.

I can't mention it and you well know that. Instant ban.

So post something about it.

He's a pollie so I just assume he is lying if he is talking. The only reason I have any interest in him is because of 8 years of relentless attacks. To begin with I thought it was the dawn of a new era, with pollies being held accountable, primarily due to social media. Turns out it was...

Posters on bigfooty regularly echo the rhetoric of child sex offenders. Oh sorry, no one is allowed to mention that are they.

Ok but in my example they are the law. I don't think trump will do anything about them anyway, nothing from his first term suggests he would, despite what the wowsers would have us believe.

What was so bad about poisoning blood? Nobody should want criminals and terrorists. Using the military against the enemy within seems extreme, but they might be people like we have in Australia who, for example, deliberately give light sentences to criminal migrants so they won't be deported...

Perhaps you could link them? I'm capable of watching a video longer than 20 seconds, btw.

Yes hopefully no more smooth brained clickbait about bloodbaths, firing squads and very fine people.

He clearly didn't watch the video he posted, because it explained the context of what Trump said directly in the video. To be fair it was over 20 seconds long.

bourbons Here is a podcast that spins Trumps garbage truck shenanigans in a direction you are more comfortable with.

He talked about his struggles getting into the truck. And how the fake news merchants would amplify any small mistake. He also mentions how much slimmer he looks wearing the hi-vis vest.

Trump is 2 steps ahead of you as usual.

Kissinger won a nobel peace prize. It's an award ceremony for narcissists and sociopaths.

This is the sort of incisive political analysis that makes this thread so great.

Mal you've spent the last couple of years saying the laptop was russian disinfo. And now apparently the complete absence of russian disinformation somehow proves russian disinformation. 🍳🤡

How much kool-aid did you drink? 4 years ago the FBI put out a vague "Russian disinformation " threat alert that led to a legit story being censored. The fact you are still here simping for the man shows how cooked you are. Why should anyone trust claims of "Russian disinformation " after that?

You can't seem to put 2 and 2 together, somehow. "Russian disinformation" was a nebulous threat, put out there by the FBI, and used to censor a story in the lead up to the election. What this "proves", is that claims of russian disinformation are very likely to be BS, not the existence of it.

Just you strawmanning again. The original story was the one that was censored, you constantly bringing up pedos and sayanic cults to try and prove a point just shows how cooked you are.

You are dead wrong. The original storry had nothing to do with pedos or satanists or anything else beyond corruption. to You continue to strawman, no surprise there as you have nothing else.

You're still cooked Mal. You are the ultimate bootlicker, you label anyone who goes against the man a cooker, just as the man intended.

What is insanre is that you think half the users on this subforum are cooked by russian disinfo, when you yourself have been cooked by american disinfo. And it wasn't half a dozen fake accounts run by a ruusian bot farm, it was the US government, the MSM and the biggest social media companies...

You are so cooked mal. you keep shifting the goalposts. we'll see what gets censored as russian disinfo this time around, no doubt you'll jump straight on it and refuse to give it up, just like the laptop that had "all the earmarks of a classic Russian disinformation campaign".

Are these the same people who said that the laptop was russian disinformation? You repeated that garbage for years and want to act like other people are cooked?

I thought it would be right up your alley, him having ties to a nazi organisation and all. Perhaps if he had criticised the banks due to interest rate rises you may have had more interest in him.

Malifice this is your time to shine, baby! We urgently need your fact checking skills combined with your obsession with all things nazi to confirm whether the shooter was in fact featured in an azov propaganda video. A simple yes or no will suffice.

Don't hate the playa hate the game.

Did you watch the video? If so, have a crack at the other lies. Lie 1 was that trump would sign a national abortion ban so you aren't off to a good start.