Search results for query: *

Ok. Even knowing this now, it still doesn't seem like Hinkley brought over 'his own man'.

Interesting. I don't remember any. I didn't think Hart was Hinkley connected ?? Does he actually want or feel he needs any assistants, apart from if he wanted to sit back on a deck chair during a match?

Has Hinkley come out of hiding to account for the last performance and held a presser to discuss the bye? How good it is and how we'd like to be as good as the bye, and how good we were against the bye last time we faced the bye and that it's a tough competition with the bye? If so then I'm not...

Just another underperformer without accountability that's there for as long as he likes

Very unlikely to make it, and more so unlikely to make it in our development system ... if that's what you can call it.

Extending and re-extending and re re-extending Hinkley is well within the realm of irresponsibility and bordering on negligence. Hiring Hartlett, a player that has overall had no success as a player and no coaching experience, to manage an all sorts reserves squad that has been spiralling since...

The club fobbed at supporters' concerns when Hinkley was smooching Dangerfield after the loss last year. The custodians believe that they understand Port Adelaide better than Port Adelaide supporters. Their collective egos are a strong dark force.

Even if something happens and Hinkley ceases to be our coach, I will not have belief if the current assistants, the chair, ceo, Davies and multiple board members are also not gone. They're all in on this loser ethos.

The gradual effect from playing in Hinkley's system

Assuming we fail again this year, I can see it now, up on the stage at the B&F, an excited David Koch praising the only positive out of the season, justifying his and Ken's existence, and seeking Godlike worship because "Ken lead us to a win at Geelong after 17 years!" 😍👏👌💋🙇‍♂️🕺

Ken's an idiot and a loser. How cringey of him to behave like a yobbo (or rather pull on his dick) towards the opposition supporters when we have been a bunch of bunnies at Geelong for all of his time as coach. After the match I hated hearing our players mimic his loser dialogue like "we expect...

I reckon it is a fitting description of our team as it relates to our mindset and vulnerability to pressure. It probably is one of a few reasons why there has been a great divide between our best and our worse performances for a decade, and why we do not beat the strong teams at least on a 50/50...

The pressure was turned up on us in the second half and we played accordingly.

I want him cut to pieces.

Agreed.

If a player left simply because 60 year old wrinkly Hinkley leaves then it shows that this player knew that he had it easy under Ken. If the player follows Hinkley to another club then he's weird.

The new coach will get rid of Wines and Dixon anyway.

It will have to be too many to trade because otherwise the individual will be traded to shut up the rest.

I don't care about seeing out a season in this extraordinary abnormal 12 year coaching failing stint. The dunce should be sacked now, and if so, the season wouldn't be any worse. I don't care about seeing out a contract. This bullshit from the club that Port Adelaide see out contacts. Did they...

Nah the players need to naturally show disengagement with the coach and game. The unrest needs to come from directors that might not care about having been tapped on the shoulder by Koch, and by others held in high regard by the club or at the club. The current custodians really believe that...

Pull the trigger. Now would be a good time.

The notion of Koch and Hinkley reigning for a further 1 to 8 years is not absurd. Them leaving on their own terms is not ideal. There needs to be unrest that develops from within and from those that have some standing with the club to demonstrate that this longevity bullshit failed miserably. It...

Truth - The club did not see any issue with this interaction at all. Our club leaders are flowers to think it is ok to watch players walking off the field looking despondent after another defeat and their coach jumping hurdles to get to an opposition figjam for a happy yarn. They don't think...

He's been questioned before, many times, but usually the Melb media get attracted by something else that takes their focus away swiftly because they really are not interested in Port, or if the attention appears to linger then the club actions ever so reliable Kane and Rucci to spin the 'good...

I read that the club (via FB) are calling this game a Big Blockbuster. I thought that playing the Woods at the MCG in the situation that they were in and the situation that we were in, was far more of a blockbuster.

Fully agree. The only way it an be addressed is to ditch the coach and the president. Those two positions set the tone of the club.

All of them. He hasn't got what it takes to be a winner.

When practically the entire side is listed, then it is not the players. We could make a list of retired big game underperformers under Ken as well. No point in making a list. It's Ken. He's not a winner.

Magpies just keep being crap each year.

They are chasing hoping for success.