Search results for query: *

Just damn well agree with everything I say and I will.

No ****en shit, hence the charges. That is where they ****ed up.

This is where the $3040 was from. "Non-cash benefits in the form of an award provided by a Club to Players up to a maximum value of $300 per week per Club, and to a maximum of $100 per week for any one Player of the Club, may be treated as not being a Player Payment and therefore not included...

Haha, never.

No worries.

Na, no cash involved. Perhaps need to ease up on the coaches charcoal chicken awards.

When the breach involves non cash incentives which are allowed by the rules and were within amounts allowed by the law it becomes very ambiguous. Football Geelong obviously had a very different interpretation and felt it was a breach and subsequentlyade their decisions.

In reality an ambiguous rule was interpreted in a way that Football Geelong determined was not within the way they wanted the rule to be used and therefore charges were laid against the club.

Pretty much everything you said. It will all come out in a day or so, but it's different to what you were told. I won't comment about particulars until after the hearing.

Wrong.

Are you serious. I know it's got nothing to do about his back. It is a complete lack of integrity. You are having a go at someone that supports your view and knows exactly what he did to port. Will try and simplify it next time.

Nup. Know plenty that don't speak highly of him. I'm sure there are plenty that do. However been around long enough and seen shit loads of guns signing with battlers, taking the cash and never turning up. So if he manages to play a lot next season it's says a fair bit about the bloke.

If O'Keeffe manages to play regular football after being unable to move with crippling back issues this season it says a fair bit about the bloke. I don't support either port or grove so it's nothing personal.

Scott Hughes leaving the lions, returning to Victoria having signed with St Mary's in Geelong Football League.