Search results for query: *

Ah let me guess, Nicky was the only player from the Wobbles? The same one bloke the Wobbles rely on for everything? Takes more than one great player to be a great team. God forbid the great (black and) white hope gets injured. It’d be like watching your favourite pub burn down. #NickyOrBust

Let’s not forget we’ve still got a finals series to play out. Win it this year, along with Cripps taking out the Brownlow as the icing on the cake. Then win the next 4+ years with Petracca. Five-pete has a nice ring to it!

This place after seeing the Petracca statement.

There's no two ways about it: we are, without a doubt, more likely to win an interstate finals game this year than the Wobbles are. I’ll take the Blues odds over the Wobbles any day. 🤣🤣

This is a hilarious take. Winning only one interstate game during the season doesn't exactly set you up for finals success, let alone winning a final interstate. If you'd performed better on the road, you might have made the finals. But alas, here we are – Blues in finals, and the Wobbles...

You won 1 interstate game during the home and away season. What makes you think you were going to win a final? 🤣🤣🤣

Wonder what odds for the Wobbles are?

Hey, not every player needs to be captain courageous. You’ve got to play to your strengths, and that’s more than okay.

Of course he’s running circles around Cripps. Cripps is in there winning the hard ball. Two different players.

I don't think you've fully understood what I've written. I didn't say the end result would be even; instead, I suspect it will start to sway in the other direction over the coming years. As the Mags and the younger Daicos will likely find out soon enough, it takes more than one gun player to...

I suspect that record will start to shift in the other direction over the coming years, as some of your greats reach their twilight years, and there’s more of a reliance on DeBlowey etc. The poor Daicos boys can’t do it all.

Yet he’s the favourite to win the Brownlow this year. What does that say about the Mags’ team list?

Yeah nah, nah nah.

Cripps is a featherweight compared to DeGoey! You’ll be just called the Mags soon, as DeGoey looks like he’s eaten all the Pies.

I'd be concerned that, while Daicos is definitely deserving of accolades, he was gifted to the club via the father-son rule, and aside from him, no other Collingwood players are prominent in these awards. This should raise serious questions about the Wobbles' recent recruitment and development...

I get the sneaky suspicion that some in here might be the Dungeons & Dragons diehard types, who spend significant time in fantasy realms with fellow enthusiasts, comfortably nestled in their own made up worlds – and possibly mum and dad's basement.

No reach, you tripped yourself up there, and it was all your own doing. Glorious to witness, though! Same old deflection now, predictable.

So, based on this logic, when comparing the performance of two teams, the one that makes the finals is the better team, right? Because how can a team be considered better if it doesn't make the finals? Hahahahahaha! You finally got there, well done!

If nothing else, he’s got stamina, Vadge – I’ve gotta give him that. But I guess there’s not much else for a Collingwood supporter to cling to at the moment.

If we followed the theories of some on here, the team that wins the grand final isn't actually the winner or the better team. Apparently, you need to analyse the fixture, free kick differentials, umpire bias, miles travelled, lucky undies colour, and dietary preferences of each team to determine...

Winning the grand final is the ultimate goal, and making the finals is a crucial step towards achieving it, yeah? Qualifying for the first round of finals brings a team closer to this goal and gives them an edge over those who don't make the cut, yeah? So, a team that secures a spot in the...

I admit, I stuffed up on the world population data - turns out trying to multitask between booking accommodation in Brisbane and crunching numbers isn’t my greatest strength. I was so focused on snagging a good spot to watch Carlton in the finals that I overlooked a basic math error. My bad, and...

But, back to the thread topic, Carlton were better than Collingwood in 2024, as they finished higher on the ladder and won more games. Fact!

Apologies, I’ve made a blunder there as was trying to crunch the numbers while organising my trip to Brisbane.

No, I'm running with, you make up stats, and your last post was another example of inaccuracy.

Typically, when presenting something as fact, it's incumbent upon you to provide evidence to support it. For example, Carlton were better than Collingwood in 2024, as they finished higher on the ladder. Fact. However, given that you tend to fabricate statistics and alter the rules at your...

I have fact checked Fadge, which is why I questioned the source of that ’fact’. A quick glance at the posts from Wobbles supporters on this thread reveals a pattern: instead of relying on verifiable facts, you tend to create your own narratives and ‘analyses’. It's clear that emotional bias...