Never a Djokovic fan but the anger is a bit over the top. He lied and made a mistake but it doesn’t make him a bad person. If everyone’s character was scrutinised like Djokovic, we might not have a tournament.
Part of me thinks if Fed was same age as Djokovic/Nadal, and did not have it so “easy” against the likes of Hewitt and Roddick, then he might have had more success against Nadal because he would be forced to adapt his game earlier. Didn’t Fed start to have more success against Nadal once he...
Hard to argue against Grand Slam wins. In fact you could also mount an argument that Novak's 20 is probably worth more as he had to overcome not just the opposition but also the crowds.
Depends on the criteria.
On a purely objective scale, then it's Djokovic as he will most likely end up with the most slams.
But if we also consider impact in the sport, then its Federer.
Ali was not undefeated.
Messi has not won a world cup.
Jordan does not have the most championships.
But...
2016 still burns inside me. Why? Because I thought we were denied a fair contest on the biggest stage by lop-sided umpiring. Simple as that. No conspiracy theories just that the umpiring was sh*t. Why do bulldog supporters feel the need to convince us otherwise? Just let us vent as much as we...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.