Search results for query: *

Why not? only club that wants him...

Hopefully he could become a corey mckernan type impact ruckman

We also had teague and morrell for mckernan who lasted only 1 year in 2004 fiasco.

After the jonathan hay fiasco, no way we are signing up another one.

Looks like the plaintiff is trying to maximise payout. Let's go to the courts and let everything out in the open.

not giving a single cent to these murdoch scums.

But we don't need to, players of the highest value should be from the club itself, those from the outside are supplements

i read that carlton has told 3 of their players to look elsewhere. Matt kennedy is 27, 190cm 90kg inside mid with 120 games, isnt that perfect for us? Future 2nd. Matt owies is also on the market, he kicked 33 goals. Future 3rd

Errr those are usually impossible to get and priorities for other clubs to re-sign.

That's a good news?

All the moaning is not going to change a thing, build a strong core list, regularly add useful role players to the list and when we are on top, add some A graders to prolong the winning culture. This is a 3 stage process, we are towards the end of stage 1.

Love it, his size seem to be the perfect crumber.

Precisely the type of player we need

Not a lot, just slight more than you. Yes do continue

Far closer than any previously named. At club, outside of larkey, we have no other key forward

But none of the 3 are key forwards though...

Perhaps you need to sniff some supplement to spice up your life.

That's for jack darling

But perhaps there is a method to this madness in that we simply threw in F1 to muddy the water to scare off the other competitors for an opportunistic pick up. From all the reportings, it seems the club is confident we have gotten the core list ready from drafting, we are into the 2nd phase of...

30+

Offerd F1 but didn't meet, that doesn't sound quite right...

So what about parker? Also what's this about our future 1st for houston?

darling is an absolute yes, no other competitor for the 2nd key forward role. owies, is a very good small forward. smith and macrae are absolute duds in that they have weak character.

No, his character is his biggest flaw in that he turned his back on the club that persisted with him and showed faith in him. He is not the type to stand up when it's required but someone who jumps ship when things get tough. Our no.1 priority is to build a core that is able to stand up under...

They would be so much more had they played for other clubs. Our player development has been vastly below the standard, it was a miracle that we made 4 finals at all under Brad. Until we address those issues we won't be getting any top players or success for that matter.

Richmond is due for a total cleanout, getting 6 top 20 picks is a great way to start that.

Darling is highly likely, lobb is a good candidate for last chancer like waite.

That will change once we start to get into regular pf finishes. Back in 96, crowds were pretty good and we only had 23k supporter.

Errr that's probably the most important factor in deciding if one comes over or not. Would you jump ship to go to another job if there is no clear career progression at that place? Players need to be developed right through the career. Our main issue is the inability to develop the player...

But why are we not attractive destination for top players? The answer is not as obvious as because we are at bottom. Firstly: We don't have anywhere near the top 8 medical team. Second: Our ability to develop players is terrible. Third: Post career opportunities We need to forget about...