Search results for query: *

A Colombo-Based Doctor Claims Australians Matthew Hayden And Adam Gilchrist Used Performance-Enhancing Drugs During World Cup http://www.dailynews.lk/2007/05/04/spo02.asp

Its your team and you can select who you like but Gilly scored more runs at a better average and a higher strike rate plus he took more catches and more stumpings than Sangakkara. Gilly was overall much better in all disiplines.

Like I said perhaps you need to look at the rules a little more closely, if the umpires agree that the ball has been tampered with they have every right to incur a five run penalty and under the laws of cricket the captain is responsible for the charge as defined in the laws of cricket. They may...

Perhaps you need to look at the laws a little more closely, the umpire does not have to know who did the tampering, all they have to do is agree that the ball has been tampered with.

I guess Chappelli will say anything to sell his book, you dont sell many by not being controversial. I dont think I will buy it if all he does is dribble on about long forgotten things like Warnie being captain.

Does Chappelli critisize Pontings captaincy in his new book?.

It must really rankle you then when the players that play under Ponting say he is a good captain.

And it also shows that Hairs action were correct. Excerpt from article

Either you are prejudiced or dont know the laws of cricket. Hair and Doctrove ageed the ball had been tampered with and changed the ball, the charge of tampering with the ball against Inzi was done by the match referee Proctor who after looking at the ball decidied that it had been tampered...

Are India trying to influence the outcome of tomorrows hearing, why would they send this letter if Hair is shown to be correct in his judgement tomorrow. Surely they wont have a leg to stand on if Inzi is punished for tampering with the ball.