Search results for query: *

Been looking at versions of 2 mid rookies aswell. For me its something like, 3 mid rooks - Duggan-Taranto-Ashcroft (means missing out of both Doch/Peatling to start season) but have all of Jagga, Ashcroft, Smillie, Lindsay, Draper and Langford. or 2 mid rooks - Farrell-Doch-Peatling (Means...

No B Smith, Daniels or Macrae? All should be forward locks, Coleman in the backline also :p.

Yeah my point being that will be one of everyones stronger weeks so unless the bye player is a big stand out example (Heeney last year) then its not really worth it as the player replacing him most like wont count or will add 5-20 points at best. Him going 110 for the year is basically him...

Like i said in my other post, the replacement score for Green is highly likely to be in the bottom 4 scores as for example Jagga, Ashcroft, Travaglia and say Langford or Hewett should be the bottom 4 scores in theory so in a best 18 week i dont see replacement players going higher than all 4-5...

The thing is the players coming onto the field for the bye players most likely wont count though. They're most likely in the bottom 4 scores so you're not really getting a replacement score in theory. If you were to say go Tom Green and he goes 110 for the year, him missing a game means in...

I do wonder if its worth starting 3 on that bye for the Mills, Roberts and Coleman combo and just taking a 0 and go with 21 that week, one of the 50's probably drops out anyway, while you have the 15+ points upside per week over someone with 5-10 max. Not saying ill do it but could be worth the...

Day i think you don't start considering the bye and there's the same upside from others without the bye. Windsor at 600k needs to hit atleast 85 you'd say to match Cumming or Peatling.

I don't see a world where you run any less than 3 mid rooks onfield this season, this year has so many good mid rooks and there's 6 that stand out and i wouldn't want to miss any of the cash gen on the bench either. But obviously means missing out on 1-2 value mids. I currently don't have Doch...

Yeah cant do much till we see it in preseason and even then it's not a given. Was leaning towards 3 already. But yeah it means fielding 2 rook defenders and only 2 rook mids, which im a little worried about but means i can get the value in the mids where as i don't see it in the defenders apart...

Have 4 variations of 3 different player combos onfield, 1 from backline, mid and ruck. What order would you go? farrell-langford-dekoning 155k left hawli-petracca-dekoning 36k left hawli-peatling-marshall 24k left burton-langford-marshall 2k left

Team after a few days of chopping and changing. Pretty happy with it, probably 5-6 players that are interchangeable. But i see value in every spot bar the rucks, JHF and maybe Sinclair. Wish i could fit Taranto and Rozee in also but only way of doing that is to downgrade JHF or Sinclair to a...

was basically 50/50 with Houston and a few for Burton, but Burton took them all when both were out.

Tempted to just field both Travaglia and Saad El-Hawli and get another premo mid with more upside than Sinclair as the backline is just full of unknowns.

Yeah possible for sure, i see it as Coleman is a lock if he plays, just need to decide on a Roberts or Mills for the second slot same bye.

You have 3 defenders on the same bye btw :p. Prob can only go 2 max to get cover from your bench unless your util has DEF position and even then still risky.

I think they want Poo in there for the future so doubt they'd take him out over the older guys, i do think Sinclair will stay back.

Yeah im seeing Sheezel go 105-108 imo. But if i have spare cash ill just upgrade my top line. But Macrae coming in means he might play less mid.

Sheezel, JHF and Langford (3 rook mids and 1 rook fwd) or Sinclair, Rozee and Curtin (2 rook mids and 2 rook fwd) Sheezel is probably 5-8 points on Sinclair, Rozee is 10-17 points on JHF, So second is ahead but Curtin could be anything, Langford if he plays surely scores more...

Tommy Mitchell's Resurgence

I mean even a 90 avg is enough, will have to wait and see probably.

Surprised no ones talking about Farrell, Evans or DBJ to fill the void/kicks ins from Houston leaving, surely a boost?

Don't see why they wouldn't put any attention into him when there's noone else xD. But im still deciding on him, Green or Rozee as my M1.

My thoughts also, thinking Whitfield will hold 110+

Rozee went 106, but agreed Taranto can go higher just hard with how bad the tigers will be and he will get tagged/focused.

Yep same here with Heeney. But there's ALOT of value from players with no byes. Currently only have 4 bye players but could go up to 6.

Do we even add the rooks score of a 50-60 if its replacing say a premo on there bye like T Green or Whitfield? Cause its most likely to drop out anyway for example with the likes of J Smith, Ashcroft, Langford, Draper, Travaglia and Hewett being higher and thats already 5. Just doing some math...

Yeah i don't see the forward line being much different apart from maybe JHF.

Add C Daniel in forward line, Curtin bench. I don't really like starting premos with early byes (Daicos), L Ashcroft in the mids needed.

OPEN!!!

I said this last year but if you were to say go Mills/Roberts and they both go 15 over there average and your bench player on there byes goes 50, you're still losing points to someone who goes 10 points over, is it really worth it? Roberts/Mills (priced at 75) go 90 avg each, thats 360 in 2...