Search results for query: *

What a gutsy win. Thought Mitchell was huge in the second half, stood up in the contest as the game was slipping away in the 3rd.

Would rather double down. Tex to Poulter, Gulden to Dawkins. Go shopping next week.

All the time.

I'd trade Berry and Gulden. Cox is good forward cover.

I like option 2. You can then hold off on Gawn until he bottoms out. Tex has to go.

Grundy for sure.

Yes. Another low score and his cash gen is cooked.

Was thinking Dusty but can't get there in a single trade unless you wanna go early on Jones for Dow. If your sold on Bowes that could be a decent single trade option.

How much cash in the bank?

Dow>Waterman Butters>Dunkley

He's on a million bucks a year. The bar needs to be set ridiculously high to justify that contract.

Yup sure is.

I'd rather ditch Phillips, Fantasia for Ridley, Waterman.

The Goonies

Entered.

Agree with this, realistically by pick 10 the high end talents are already off the board. Saying you have two first rounders sounds good but when they are back end first round it's hardly a bumper crop of picks.

Is that you Eddie?

Damage control. Club is going to spin some crap on this one instead of just saying they stuffed the salary cap up and had to shed players.

Club are shining a turd with that response. Failing to mention the plethora of picks we sent back the other way.

2-3 years ago would do that deal, but at 29 would have to give up to much for a guy who has maybe 3-4 years left.

That's fair but giving up on a bloke after just 3 years says a lot about the club also.

The Treloar trade I can live with. But Stephenson would be bizarre. There must be some serious behind the scenes issues with him if it is being considered. His trade value would be low after a down year.

It is a forum. Negative comments will outway the positive. Just the way it goes with any forum regardless of topic.

Would be a bizarre move for both clubs if true. I don't see it.

Yes he is. Is every bit the equal of Treloar in terms of trade value.

You would be laughed out of the room if that trade was presented to Essendon.

Agree with this. He appears to be over the soft tissue injuries but you just never know. If he remains injury free then the deal works out well for Darcy, but could go the other way just as easily. I'm ok for the club to not lock in injury prone players to long deals.

Daicos and Quaynor the highlights. Knocking West Coast off in the elimination final a close second. Struggling to find a third.

It's the Collingwood tax. Biggest club in town, media in general elevate the worth of all players, leaves them thinking they are worth more than market value. List management has fallen into the trap when it comes to contracts, paying overs. Still, if we win the flag in 2018 our list management...

Oliver in the blink of an eye.