Would end up something like...
Mckercher, Duursma, Goad, Dawson, Hardeman
V
Mckercher, Caddy, Curtin, Hardeman
Simplified:
Duursma, Dawson, Goad
V
Caddy, Curtin
On top 7 talent it appears break even in the simplest of comparisons, with Duursma and Curtin winning their prospective match ups...
Say what you want about trading out 3rd rounder for a future 4th, at least it wasn't as bad as
Out: 14, 27, 35
In: 11
Only to find out WC ain't interested in your 6 and 11 combo.
Deal misses Duursma & Watson.
Left with Sanders, Curtin.
Unless they went Duursma @ 2, then caught Sanders, Curtin at 5,6 to end up addressing all thirds of the ground.
Wanted pick 4, didn't get it.
Wanted pick 11, didn't get it.
North owe them nothing.
Enough evidence the "we won't bid" for getting something in return is BF fantasy.
It's a hypothetical trade scenario expanding on the post i quoted.
Not to say I prefer to trade or to hold myself, I don't have a strong opinion one way or another.
Was hoping someone might offer more of an insight on Duursma V Caddy+Osullivan actually.
If you or anyone else here thinks they...
With the CBA increase, I doubt anybody but a legitimate star of the competition will be netting band 1 going fwd.
Afl need to declare as much. "Compo will not be "purchased" by what a panel may deem as buying a higher compensation."
People need to realise this for what it was. AFL gave us pick 3. They used this years salary to cook the books.
If they were assholes the rule change would've been brought in BEFORE North benefited.
Other than give us a round one PP, what else could they have done this year?
Three picks and...
'WC need to receive 'a free 1st rounder.'
If they are absolutely hell Bent on Reid, and noone allows us to trade our late picks up.
Then split 3 into 6 & 11.
But keep 6.
North: 1, 6, 15, 17, 18
WC : 2, 11, 23
Absolute worst case a swap of picks 18, and 23.
North : 1, 6, 15, 17, 23
WC : 2...
Pick 3 vs Pick 6 and 8?
Split 3 for 6, 11. Then 11 & 18 for 7 or 8.
Mckercher, + 2 of Caddy, Osullivan, Curtin
V
Mckercher, Duursma
If Duursma is rated that highly, go tall across the park,
Duursma, + two talls.
Tall stocks : Larkey.....Logue....abyss.
Draft a Mckercher with the top 5...
First, we have to accept that statistically, Australia churns out 'x' number of decent draft prospects per year. Over long term, let's assume the number is consistent.
It is generally accepted the closer to pick 1, the higher the potential.
The people devaluing picks after FS, are simply...
Souup said you don't take Caddy once you have Duursma.
But also, come on....the talls. The cupboards bare.
Larkey and Logue soon turn 26.
The bet would be, is the difference between Duursma and Caddy greater than another top 10 pick on the list.
Same question could be asked of Reid, IF, you...
Pick 3, or two of Watto, Curtin, Osullivan, Caddy?
3 into 6 & 11.
11 & 18 into 8.
2, 6, 8, 15, 17.
Edit. Caught up on prev. Posts, SOUUP is all for Duursma.
Agree on all counts. But you're actually understating the delusion their echo chamber's caused.
They think 2 AND 3 is unders.
They're leaning more towards:
2 and 3 and our F1
2 and 3 and two of 15, 17, 18
2 and 3 and one of 15, 17, 18
To be fair, there's one voice of reason over there...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.