Search results for query: *

No worries, it'll be interesting to see if anything pans out in the future. My preference would be a new team, rather than a current team representing all of Canberra. I think it'd get more support. A strong Canberra VFL team is also good for GWS with the ACT in your catchment area!

Do you have more info on this? Do you know if it's the Demons returning (or another big club like Ainslie), or is it a joint AFL Canberra entity?

I know it's not relevant to the thread, but the VFA/VFL is actually a couple of weeks younger than the SANFL. I'm not against the history and statistics of the VFA continuing in the EAFL. Just as they have through previous name changes. I think the NEAFL's history should be included, too...

The VFL has only had its name since 1996. Updating a 25-year name to a more inclusive league name wouldn't affect the VFL clubs' "rich and valuable history". Aspley and Southport are strong, historical clubs with six decades of history (just as long as Werribee). Brisbane and Sydney have as...

It was billed as a merger between the NEAFL and VFL. Still being called the VFL, it's more like a hostile takeover. The AFL changed its name after only three interstate teams, and that was a continuation of a league, but the new merged league can't do that with double the interstate teams? The...

I agree (especially if the disappointing part was referring to the name). The VFL name doesn't allay the calls of #VICBIAS. The comp has six non-Victorian sides, possibly more later (theoretically Tassie and I hope a future Canberra team), all playing in a competition called the Victorian...