Search results for query: *

The players’ defence team did not know the timing of the logging of the ban when they were found guilty in January 2016, the publication added. No frkn way could they not have known when it was listed as banned. How is that possible?

Or he buys 500 hectares out the back of Woodend and finds true peace. Who knows.

You are right to a point. You need to remember that the media are for profit organisations and they know more people will watch their news programs or read their newspapers when there is a smattering of this type of coverage. The wider public are as responsible as the media although they don't...

I don't disagree with any of that. The post i was replying to stated that Long had said the medal should be taken off Watson. Clearly he didn't say that. It really is shit journalism getting someone so close to the club to talk about a sensitive matter like this. Bit like asking Bill Clinton if...

“I don’t really have a position on it, but I think you’ve got to go along the guidelines and rules, that’s what they’re there for. "I don't have a position on it" is a long (pun intended) way from saying the medal should be taken off Watson.

If he was looking at first offence then club would have told him to take the gamble. Makes me think this guy has been caught blowing lines before and was worried about getting his third strike. I just hope that he was blowing his lines of the arse of a 1k an hour hooker. Let's be honest, who...

I feel for you. You're caught between a rock and a hard place. Stick fat, those grand final things go alright from what i experienced a few weeks ago. For supporters like you I would be okay for Essendon to win one but not for awhile yet. I don't want Essendon to win with any banned players.

By your way of thinking you are saying that if a sportsman contests a charge then they are more likely innocent. In Essendons case, they contested charges on the back of a continuum of bad legal advice.

You still don't think he has been proven guilty? Seriously?

Did Slippery Sammy D cry today when he fessed up to getting caught doing naughty things with mr wang and friends? No Harden up princess. It's a hard world, when you do the wrong thing you have bad outcomes, they are called consequences. What is so hard to understand about this simple life...

Does he mentions the grounds for legal action? Does he aknowledge that EFC are far higher up the litigation chain than the AFL. Funny how the blame seems to be elswhere. Head in sand tosser.

The article is from the examiner in Tasmania so it must be quality.

I am picturing the look on Tracy's face when you asked that question.

Are you suggesting the players got onto the ASADA website to determine what they are required to list on the control form but didn't bother to check what was being pumped into them while they were on the site? That's bullshit. They would most likely been under the impression they should list...

Robbo mentioned the word carnage on several occasions. Carnage is what Robbo inflicts on any media organisation he has anything to do with. Full credit to Gerrard for not face palming whenever Robbo opens his mouth. Gill has got a beautiful head of hair. That's what I've got to say about that.

I didn't know that Mike Fitzpatrick had passed away. So sad. Did they seriously think nobody would notice? #weekendatfitzies

Which makes me think it would be hard for them to sue the club. They were educated on what to do regarding injections and chose not to take any action. It would be interesting if they do sue the club and the clubs defence is that they were in on it.

Kill kill kill mr smart.

I thought WADA were simply the PR arm of the IOC?

I'm in Vietnam.

I'm after tesla1962, she does it for me.

Sounds like speed dating to me.

I think he will take the carlton coaching position. God let it be so.

If he doesn't read the papers then how does he keep updated with the goings on of Brynne Edlesten?

The terminology used in this thread reflects that of the doping world reported in the media. If swimmer X test for high levels of a particular thingie then it is reported as a positive test. If swimmer Y test for a slightly lower level of the same thingie then there is no positive test. The...

But any inference applys to all the players with thymo on consent forms.

Why? Their test are not positive for illegal levels of tb4 as I understand it. They are simply higher than normal. It doesn't prove anything but would certainly help the circumstantial case they already have. This is bad news for the players but no more for the 2 who's tests are being discussed.

Wouldn't they just take more tb4 to ensure continued elevation.

Does this mean the players will have their faces fuzzied out again?

Copy this into Google images "the castle its the vibe court case". It returns quite a few pics of Jimbo.