Search results for query: *

Sour grapes? Kinda. I just think the whole sling tackle issue is a bit of a joke (Jack Trengove last year was a disgrace), but that's a whole new issue. IMO the MRP should take intent into account above all else - accidents are part of footy. Good luck for the rest of the year - if anyone...

Agree to disagree. In my eyes, anyone who bumps they way Thompson did does not deserve weeks. People who think he should have been rubbed out are the reason the game is becoming softer. Next players will be getting rubbed out for aggressive tackles that incidently hurt the opposition... oh.

Selwood on Raines & Hunt on Betts. Not saying they should have gone, but with the MRP these days would you have been surprised if either of these were suspended?

Quote my post where I've shown disrespect. All I said was I don't think you can claim "if it was a Geelong player he would have been suspended". You guys have had a pretty good run with the MRP this year, and I don't think the Thompson hit warranted suspension, regardless of who he plays for...

Haha good one mate. Just let the rest of BF know the Geelong board is not a place for actual discussion, only one-eyed opinion from the folk down at Kardinia.

So do you believe if it was Rory Sloane for example who bumped Stevie J, he would have received weeks because he's not in Brownlow contention? Even I'm not that cynical!

Are you serious, any Geelong player would've been serving weeks? Just like Selwood for punching Raines or Hunt for stepping on Betts' arm? Get your hand off it mate. The issue here is the MRP is just so inconsistent. Anyone who is a lover of football should be pleased Thompson is playing this...