Eventually, for the next 2 years he is our best mid.Thats his best position. as a forward
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Eventually, for the next 2 years he is our best mid.Thats his best position. as a forward
Doesn't say much, Look at what Daicos was up to.Eventually, for the next 2 years he is our best mid.
With our full midfield available on the weekend, they were rarely at the same centre bounce, with Prestia, Bolton, Baker all rotating through there. Hopper started the game on the bench.I think the issue is we keep playing Hops and TT together in the middle. Having 1 in there at all times is the go. Bulls inside but lack a yard are important still, but what team plays 2 of that type every game?
Hopefully. Could be a weapon.He will go forward once our batch of kids develop and take the mid spots off him and Hopper.
That was a first though from memory.With our full midfield available on the weekend, they were rarely at the same centre bounce, with Prestia, Bolton, Baker all rotating through there. Hopper started the game on the bench.
You are comparing one of the best kids we have seen who will be on well over a mill when negotiations start. Silly comparison.Doesn't say much, Look at what Daicos was up to.
im comparing dollars vs dollars arm, not so sillyYou are comparing one of the best kids we have seen who will be on well over a mill when negotiations start. Silly comparison.
how is that relevant?im comparing dollars vs dollars arm, not so silly
especially for how cheap he would have come.Can't believe we didn't recruit Daicos.
its relevant to put into perspective how much the skill gap is between the two players and how much overs we paid for TT and hopper.how is that relevant?
Dude its really not though heyits relevant to put into perspective how much the skill gap is between the two players and how much overs we paid for TT and hopper.
Believe what you want bro. all goodDude its really not though hey
Not shocked to see you here having a crack again. Anytime Taranto has an off game or the like you're the first to jump up and down about how we "overpaid".its relevant to put into perspective how much the skill gap is between the two players and how much overs we paid for TT and hopper.
Club was asleep at the wheel 30 years ago not drafting his dad and playing him over 100 gamesCan't believe we didn't recruit Daicos.
ok, i admit ive gone overboard, but doesn't mean I'm wrong.Not shocked to see you here having a crack again. Anytime Taranto has an off game or the like you're the first to jump up and down about how we "overpaid".
I agree we overpaid for Hopper but it's easy to say that when you have the benefit of hindsight.
Regarding Taranto, I'll happily come in here and cut you off at the knees whenever you target him. We were instantly better as a team when he came back from injury. I know that you will only accept him being a top 5 player in the comp based on what we paid but again how you, yourself, rates a players worth is not going to be the same as the club or anyone else.
We paid 12 and 19 for Taranto and both those picks got pushed out when all was set and done after the draft. This is his second year after winning a B&F in his first year at the club and he still has another 5 years to run.
It's ridiculous to say we overpaid.
Drop the vendetta against the guy. It's tiresome.
Why should he if he believes he’s right, just as you believe you’re right? Nonsense Prodigy.Not shocked to see you here having a crack again. Anytime Taranto has an off game or the like you're the first to jump up and down about how we "overpaid".
I agree we overpaid for Hopper but it's easy to say that when you have the benefit of hindsight.
Regarding Taranto, I'll happily come in here and cut you off at the knees whenever you target him. We were instantly better as a team when he came back from injury. I know that you will only accept him being a top 5 player in the comp based on what we paid but again how you, yourself, rates a players worth is not going to be the same as the club or anyone else.
We paid 12 and 19 for Taranto and both those picks got pushed out when all was set and done after the draft. This is his second year after winning a B&F in his first year at the club and he still has another 5 years to run.
It's ridiculous to say we overpaid.
Drop the vendetta against the guy. It's tiresome.
That's pretty much what wrong means.ok, i admit ive gone overboard, but doesn't mean I'm wrong.
nope, it does not, going on about a subject and being wrong are completely two different things.That's pretty much what wrong means.
Well, I can substantiate my opinion with proven on field numbers and this...Why should he if he believes he’s right, just as you believe you’re right? Nonsense Prodigy.
Nothing wrong with having a debate without being personal.
FWIW I can just tolerate TT only bc he’s above anything else currently on our list, but JH I can’t understand how we ended up getting him as he’s a one paced donkey.
Name the players. (picks 14 and 23 by the time they were used, by the way)almost guaranteed that we wouldve done better with 12 and 18 than tim tarranto
I have no ideaName the players. (picks 14 and 23 by the time they were used, by the way)
Realest post you've ever made....I have no idea