2011/12 A-League Kits

Remove this Banner Ad

Oct 16, 2010
2,166
973
AFL Club
Collingwood
The Reebok contract/sponsorship has expired so the A-league clubs are now free to get their kits made by other manufacturers.

CONFIRMED
Melbourne Heart - ISC
Melbourne Victory - Adidas
Wellington Phoenix - Adidas
Adelaide United - Errea
Sydney FC - Adidas
Central Coast Mariners - Hummel
Brisbane Roar - Puma
Gold Coast United - Fi-ta
Perth Glory - Blades
Newcastle Jets - ISC

EDIT: The info above is coming from manufacturer's websites and the FourFourTwo website.

Feel free to post your thoughts, any rumours, questions and pictures.
 
5544094860_091e36dfed_b.jpg


?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I am more interested in the away kits as other than Newcastle the only changes are the new manufacturers putting their own template on the strips.

Glory are going to have another bland white kit for our away. Hopefully some of the other clubs go out of the box.

Victory are rumoured to have this:

images
 
I am more interested in the away kits as other than Newcastle the only changes are the new manufacturers putting their own template on the strips.

Glory are going to have another bland white kit for our away. Hopefully some of the other clubs go out of the box.

Victory are rumoured to have this:

images

I don't know why, but I think that's bloody awesome.
 
Victory kits look good, like the idea of a fluro away.

Bad luck for CCM signing up with hummel who love putting those shitty arrows all over their merchandise.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

i like all the rumoured adidas kits. But the Adelaide United one doesn't really look nice because of the collar but i don't mind umbro
 
Staggering how shit the old deal for clubs was, they only received 5% of the sale of a shirt. United will get 50% of a sale, and are putting it towards junior levels in SA.
 
5%? Are you serious? Yet they charge a small fortune for one?

I guess it was another rubbish deal that the A-League had to accept to get everything started, alla the fairly poor 7 year TV deal.
Well that's what United got, so assuming everyone had the same Reebok deal (which I'm fairly certain they did) every club was in the same boat.
 
Gold Coast have signed up with Fi-Ta, a local Australian company.

No idea on the financial benefits to the club.
 
How could any of them do worse than Reebok? And all clubs should make substantially more revenue from each shirt sale so I can't see any losers.
 
Staggering how shit the old deal for clubs was, they only received 5% of the sale of a shirt. United will get 50% of a sale, and are putting it towards junior levels in SA.

Where on earth did the rest of the money go? That was a terrible deal
 
Gold Coast have signed up with Fi-Ta, a local Australian company.

No idea on the financial benefits to the club.

Says on their website that fi-ta are the official supplier to both the Yass Minor Rugby League and Goulburn Stockmen Junior Rugby League teams.

Good to see GCU in appropriate company there.
 
How could any of them do worse than Reebok? And all clubs should make substantially more revenue from each shirt sale so I can't see any losers.

Financially they'll be fantastic no doubt, but I fear that a company whose number one deal is supplying a minor league rugby team might not be at the cutting edge of design! I hear u bout reebok being shit but I still worry bout GCUs shirts...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2011/12 A-League Kits

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top