- Apr 25, 2011
- 8,061
- 18,919
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Did Narkle even play a game of AFL in 2022?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did Narkle even play a game of AFL in 2022?
No he isn't.Played 8. 3 of them as unused med sub.
Certainly worth a look as a 24 year old who has had time in the system.
Whether there’s actually issues I have no idea.
But the idea of looking at the best teams fringe players isn’t the worst.
Free swing why notPlayed 8. 3 of them as unused med sub.
Certainly worth a look as a 24 year old who has had time in the system.
Whether there’s actually issues I have no idea.
But the idea of looking at the best teams fringe players isn’t the worst.
No he isn't.
Free swing why not
It SHOULD be irrelevant but the reality is that it’s not. League is littered with players that were traded for overs in their early 20s partly because they were a former top 10 pick.
Not sure there’s too many recent examples of this.
Logue would be about as good as example as you get but he’s still shown he’s capable of playing at AFL level. And he plays a position that’s hard to find.
If players like Josh Schache or Paddy Dow were traded it’d be for peanuts. Personally I think Schache will be delisted and won’t find a suitor.
He is a spud and it's a minor miracle he is still on their list.Oh ok.
Do you mind creating a post with all of your ideas so I can just reference back to it for confirmation.
I’d hate to waste time on a discussion forum about hypotheticals when it’s so definitive in
100%Ffs we aren’t accepting 29 for Lobb in this s**t draft. Ignore the VIC journalists.
With regards to Meek, it has to be a pick in the 30s-40s or we hold.
The difference would be that out of Logue, Dow and Schache - one of them has been offered $3.5m over five years and the other two might not have a job at AFL level at all once their current contract ends.
That's why Logue is worth a high pick. That he was a top ten pick isn't really relevant. It probably is why his name was noticed by North though and why he stuck around at AFL level after his first seasons were destroyed with injury - he might not have had as much luck if he was a pick 60
Might be 29 with a swap of futures.Ffs we aren’t accepting 29 for Lobb in this s**t draft. Ignore the VIC journalists.
With regards to Meek, it has to be a pick in the 30s-40s or we hold.
Narkle delisted. Worth a shot
He is a spud and it's a minor miracle he is still on their list.
Ahhh yes, the yearly chat about spud Narkle resumes. No, f**k no, seriously noThere’s better players in the state leagues than Quinton Narkle imo. Much better players get delisted every season tbh.
Don’t think he’ll be on an AFL list next season.
Remember a fair few people in here saying the same about Clark being a spud too. The reality is Fremantle need mature age players and Narkle is worth a shot. His best is pretty damn goodThere’s better players in the state leagues than Quinton Narkle imo. Much better players get delisted every season tbh.
Don’t think he’ll be on an AFL list next season.
Where do we want to play Narkle?
Forward? Realistically he isn't as quick, as big or as productive as Banfield.
Midfield? Are we just adding another mature body to fill the void left by Blakely at Peel?
No. Move him on for the right price.Might be 29 with a swap of futures.
He doesn’t want to be at freo, move him on