They’ll get something back…
I hope it’s Melbourne’s F1.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They’ll get something back…
So we've cooked the list because acres doesn't want to sign the contract with us where he earns more money than the contract with carlton if he meets the performance clauses? Yer nah.We’ve cooked the list, letting players go like Acres reeks of salary cap mismanagement. All good getting Jackson, he’ll be very good. But he’s not going to tip us from 6th to a premiership. Especially losing Lobb, Logue, Acres, Mundy all in one off season.
As melting and being irrational over trading news is a passion of mine, I might be starting to come around to your thinking. On reflection, it might just be that the only time we "win" trades is with GC or St Kilda. Feels like most other clubs we do a poor job for what the player should be worth at the time of trade
But maybe the whole thing looks better after trade period and I'm going early on the melt...
Even that doesn't compare to the overreactions in here based purely on rumours and speculation.We might be s**t at trades but boy do we come cartwheeling into the room when it’s time to hand out stupid contracts
I think Stengle performs because of the quality of having Hawkins and Cameron.im worried about both…
but agree we need the forwards first…
Stengle is everything you want in a small forward
If we don't offer a top 10 pick, then what?I 100% agree but Melbourne have already said they want 2 firsts & 1 to be top 10.
Freo have put too much work in to not deliver the trade.
Jackson would be pick one this year & next year. The kid is a star
Exactly my thinking too. He was arguably the most consistent finals performer behind Serong. Felt like he finally got his niche and belongs. His performance v Geelong still clear as day. Took on Blicavs, Guthrie and he put on a clinic. The club must back Johnson, Worner and lesser extent Henry. A huge if. NOD and Johnson doesn't seem comfortable. Henry at this point of his career is on the crossroads and look meh.A third round pick for Acres is a joke. I don't understand why we let him go, I watched our finals game against the bull dogs and he was really prominent.
He's been really super this year and is only 26 yo and I think he has finally hit his peak and found his place on the field. He is so good overhead and his kicking is generally really good, can kick a goal too. 189cm tall ,big body ,tackles well ,huge tank, runs both ways ,he looked to be really hitting his straps and would have been great for us for the next 4 or so years at least.
It just doesn't make sense ,I'd rather him then Logue to be honest and Logue too ,we should have kept as an important swingman, they are rare and a really good thing to have.
Not sure what they are doing at the club but if these players were not that important in their eyes ,why are all the eastern states clubs going after them with really good contracts, Carlton needed a wingman , so we just said here ,we'll give you Acres ,we have shaped him and he's now an A grade wingman. Now we have a big hole to fill, doesn't make sense.
Meh, I'm still trying to recall one game where either Logue or Acres was the difference between winning and losing. Sure Acres played some decent footy but he's no match winner.I'm busting a gut not to be triggered and commence a tyrannical rant of epic proportions. I just hope that losing so many experienced players in one off-season doesn't cause us to go backwards next year...
Acres isn't an A grade wingman. That's wearing purple glasses.A third round pick for Acres is a joke. I don't understand why we let him go, I watched our finals game against the bull dogs and he was really prominent.
He's been really super this year and is only 26 yo and I think he has finally hit his peak and found his place on the field. He is so good overhead and his kicking is generally really good, can kick a goal too. 189cm tall ,big body ,tackles well ,huge tank, runs both ways ,he looked to be really hitting his straps and would have been great for us for the next 4 or so years at least.
It just doesn't make sense ,I'd rather him then Logue to be honest and Logue too ,we should have kept as an important swingman, they are rare and a really good thing to have.
Not sure what they are doing at the club but if these players were not that important in their eyes ,why are all the eastern states clubs going after them with really good contracts, Carlton needed a wingman , so we just said here ,we'll give you Acres ,we have shaped him and he's now an A grade wingman. Now we have a big hole to fill, doesn't make sense.
Yah, I hope he's our version of Dodoro. Long term stalwart.I’m happy Walls is underrated. Don’t want him poached by East Coast clubs.
He’s doing the job he loves most, and we appreciate the job he does.. win win!
Carlton will grab him soonYah, I hope he's our version of Dodoro. Long term stalwart.
I find the rumour very very hard to believe.Acres isn't an A grade wingman. That's wearing purple glasses.
And the rumour on here is that we actually offered Acres the chance to earn more. Its just that our contract was performance based but Carlton's money was guaranteed.
Tells you all you need to know about where he is at: he chose less money but guaranteed over the chance to earn more but having to depend on his own performance.
In terms of the Private School V Public thing, it was a while ago now but I'm a good example of that.
I played over 100 games of junior footy, was Captain of my club for most of them, F&B twice, combined side centreman etc.
My parents decided to send me to the local high school while all my best friends went private. My Dad died not long after and I ended up getting into drugs and smoking and stopped footy.
I'm not saying that was anyone's fault but I doubt very much, with my record I'd have been allowed to fall between the cracks at a Private school.
The only strategy with Acres is to not trade. Where does that leave us: PSD?
Would other clubs bight if he did go that route?
I'll be very interested to see the difference in value between Tucker and Acres to see how much a difference contracted means to us.
If we trade a future second, we can't trade a future first.
So if it's #13 and F2 for #8 then it has to be #8 by itself or #8 and F3, F4 etc
Can't be F1 without them sending us a F2 back.
Its not really a strategy though. We don't want him (at least at market rate), I'm not sure why we play hardball and push him to the PSD to then lose him for nothing?
Acres isn't an A grade wingman. That's wearing purple glasses.
And the rumour on here is that we actually offered Acres the chance to earn more. Its just that our contract was performance based but Carlton's money was guaranteed.
Tells you all you need to know about where he is at: he chose less money but guaranteed over the chance to earn more but having to depend on his own performance.
There’s a reason acres and Logue were low balled with there offers mid way though the year. I mightn’t be 900 but would have to be closeI'd be shocked if we were offering $900k (or more) per year to Jackson as has been reported in the media and as you stated