- Sep 10, 2018
- 3,316
- 2,476
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Ferrari
Thought this would have been of fox footy?
Instead I've gotta watch Sydney s**t the bed in the GF again...
Trade radio is covering it?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Thought this would have been of fox footy?
Instead I've gotta watch Sydney s**t the bed in the GF again...
But like the rain in the air... you can smell it.
If we kept 9 and got 3 could we see the club try and split 9?
I read it as they wanted to give a future first instead of 3, not asking for an extra first?So they wanted two firsts and Clark for 3.
So three picks for one. In an environment where if you aren't a top 5 or 6 you don't get a quality player from other teams, they want us to burn our future.
If we did that well there would be no defending it.
CMON SAINTS MAKE THE BIG NOSED campaigner BLINKDo not talk to Brady Rawlings. If you think you're gonna blink first you haven't seen s**t.
Meanwhile that high draft pick from the draft 5 years ago gets traded for a half eaten dim sim, and a used myki card.Every year…
“This draft is a belter”.
Then later…
“It’s a deep draft… but drops off a little after the first few”.
Then…
“Next years is better”.
They were definitely asking for our future first. They wanted 9, Clark and our F1 for 3.I read it as they wanted to give a future first instead of 3, not asking for an extra first?
They were definitely asking for our future first. They wanted 9, Clark and our F1 for 3.
YayTrade radio is covering it?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Barrels thought he had a chance with Gisele, once she left Tom BradyThey were definitely asking for our future first. They wanted 9, Clark and our F1 for 3.
Obviously seeing as u asked for itWe are chasing future firsts
and current firsts and a top ten player FMDWe are chasing future firsts
That's for pick 3. Hey guys you didn't get that much for pick 1 or for that matter either of them. So dream on no wonder you have no coach no players in fact no hope.So they wanted two firsts and Clark for 3.
So three picks for one. In an environment where if you aren't a top 5 or 6 you don't get a quality player from other teams, they want us to burn our future.
If we did that well there would be no defending it.
Much, much much better surely….Llyod saying the proposed deal was a future 2nd and something else - not sure how recent that deal is or if he is basing that on the month old reports - but based off what Gags said to Jon Ralph 30 minutes ago, that's not good enough and we will need something much better to do it.
CMON SAINTS MAKE THE BIG NOSED campaigner BLINK
3 and a future second for 9 and gymratSo what version of the Hunter trade would we actually be happy with?
Do they have any picks at all between 3 and say 40 odd?That's for pick 3. Hey guys you didn't get that much for pick 1 or for that matter either of them. So dream on no wonder you have no coach no players in fact no hope.
Get a big black dog up ya North.
Pick 3 and..... nah stuff ya that's all for HC.
If he loves playing with LDU then pick 9 and next year's first for LDU and he can play with the Saints.
On SM-G977B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Make him cave and give us pick 3 by itself for Clark, we offered them overs tell them to **** off if they come back and accept itThe problem is if we DO make him cave... it's for a TERRIBLE deal which we have proposed.
Literally a lose/lose.
They will write about it in negotiating textbooks for decades as THE model for lose/lose.
Clarks made a lot of noise about wanting the trade. Reckon if it falls over because north asked for too much he’d be bloody pissed off.
North have to get it done.