- Mar 14, 2014
- 40,705
- 75,273
- AFL Club
- Gold Coast
No.Wait till the end of the trade period before we throw shade please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.Wait till the end of the trade period before we throw shade please.
There was a NO bid on Walter claus in the trade11 and Burgess for 23,26,27,35 seems alright on the surface? Surely that’s just about all the points we need?
18 for future pick 19 is classic Cameron though unless more is involved.
It's basically 23,26,27,35, dogs future 1st and an end of first next year for pick 4 and Chris Burgess.Back to hating Craig cameron.
11 and Burgess for 23 and 26.
18 for north's end of first round future
No current season stats available
I guess, more picks trade or involved in Chol, Hollands trade. List spots must equal pick number when draft starts. We will be coming into draft with 6-7 lists spots according to Cameron.So how does it work now? Say we go into the draft with that hand and 6 list spots, does that mean 61,65,70,73 vanish? Or after we get rid of a few picks to match Walter, those picks then become available to match the number of list spots?
Because I assume those late picks will come in quite a bit given the amount of matching that will be done.
Moving pick into future since we have enough this year, I guess. Nothing wrong with it, IMO.18 for future pick 19 is classic Cameron though unless more is involved.
Moving pick into future since we have enough this year, I guess. Nothing wrong with it, IMO.
Makes sense to ask for future picks for Chol and Hollands too.I guess, more picks trade or involved in Chol, Hollands trade. List spots must equal pick number when draft starts. We will be coming into draft with 6-7 lists spots according to Cameron.
and GC on-trades both picks...(and then on trades pick 14 that they got in an on trade)
It's now #4,#46,#51, F3 & Burgess for...
#23,#26,#27,#35, F1 (Dogs), F1 (North, end of round)
I'm sure some of the numbers are a little off now (that's what they were at the time of the trades), but at roughly speaking, GC are up by 145pts and 2 future firsts.
Makes sense to ask for future picks for Chol and Hollands too.
Could give Hawthorn a couple of those late picks for their FS as we can't use them anyway.
F2 for Chol and 65 + 70 for example.
Yeah, something like that.Makes sense to ask for future picks for Chol and Hollands too.
Could give Hawthorn a couple of those late picks for their FS as we can't use them anyway.
F2 for Chol and 65 + 70 for example.
We can always trade during draft night if more points needed. Also as picks are used by teams to match bids late picks become better picks (more points). 300 pints or so deficit would be fine too.I'm a little worried about how many picks we have. We can only use as many picks as we have vacancies on our list, and while we might get another club to help us out a little, it's still a LOT of picks.
We also don't have THAT many points spare (at least, not on a worst case scenario), so ideally I'd be looking to trade our current picks up so we have fewer, higher value, picks rather than moving more into next year.
I don't think there is a need to get future picks for a particular purpose, just a product of getting only what we need for bid matching and then pushing the excess value to next year when hopefully we have options in terms of attracting and trading for playersIsn’t there something around you have to have as many list spots as you do pics? Or is that prior to the trade period can somebody clear that up?
If we’re okay with all the pics with have now then it’s a really good result. If we have to on trade some more to get consolidation well, then maybe not
If you look at what we gave up and what we now have on our pocket, it’s a good result. I do wonder why we want so much collateral in next years draft
Should be possible to consolidate a few picks if needed. Geelong for example don't have many picks, so might swap whatever they get for Ratugolea for a few later ones.Isn’t there something around you have to have as many list spots as you do pics? Or is that prior to the trade period can somebody clear that up?
If we’re okay with all the pics with have now then it’s a really good result. If we have to on trade some more to get consolidation well, then maybe not
If you look at what we gave up and what we now have on our pocket, it’s a good result. I do wonder why we want so much collateral in next years draft
Back to hating Craig cameron.
11 and Burgess for 23 and 26.
18 for north's end of first round future
Pick | Points | Bid | Points | Discount | |
23 | 815 | 2 | 2517 | 2014 | |
26 | 729 | 7 | 1644 | 1315 | |
27 | 703 | 15 | 1112 | 890 | |
31 | 606 | 30 | 629 | 503 | |
35 | 522 | ||||
37 | 483 | ||||
61 | 135 | ||||
3993 | 4722 |