pushintheback
All Australian
- May 31, 2010
- 867
- 885
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Maybe he Rule'd himself outDid he nominate?
Can’t see his name.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe he Rule'd himself outDid he nominate?
Can’t see his name.
There would definitely be more clubs passing but I think that is fine. Would rather a club passed than do what some do now and pick up a kid for 6 months knowing full well he wont get a game but is just there as a body.It would probably be a draft full of passes. List size would need to grow before that could happen.
exactly, not even Teal who has nominated for a long contract. Unlikely they are doing that if they don't have interest
Have we Munkara'd him?Jed Rule has been playing for Heidelberg. Doubt he gets picked up
Maybe make it if you nominate 18 months you can be picked up by any club , 6 months only home state clubs. If I had a opportunity to try prove myself I would take any time frame offered.There would definitely be more clubs passing but I think that is fine. Would rather a club passed than do what some do now and pick up a kid for 6 months knowing full well he wont get a game but is just there as a body.
I still think 6 months is just way too short a timeframe to get a good idea on a player, particularly with them not having an AFL preseason and coming into a new team halfway through a season.Maybe make it if you nominate 18 months you can be picked up by any club , 6 months only home state clubs. If I had a opportunity to try prove myself I would take any time frame offered.
It’s definitely not ideal but while the list size is the way it is I don’t think there is much choice. Maybe a 18 month Rookie category C .I still think 6 months is just way too short a timeframe to get a good idea on a player, particularly with them not having an AFL preseason and coming into a new team halfway through a season.
And realistically it’s probably more like 3 months (June, July, august) for most teams.I still think 6 months is just way too short a timeframe to get a good idea on a player, particularly with them not having an AFL preseason and coming into a new team halfway through a season.
Especially true if the next club in line was prepared to offer the longer contract.Still unsure why the AFL hasn't just made it a mandatory 18 month contract for mid season draftees. 6 months is ridiculous particularly for someone having to move interstate. If clubs don't want to offer that length then they don't get to take a free 6 month hit.
If we don't get Hansen Jr I want one of the BHH boys.
We need to continue to reward Box Hill to entice players that it's a draft pathway especially through the Hawks.
Good for the culture and development if we have a strong second side and we will only get that by enticing the best talent to Box Hill.
Why? If you’re not prepared to move on a 6 month contract don’t nominate!If you have to move to play with the club it should automatically be a year and a half.
I think the reason they did it because rookie contracts are only 12 months. You’d have more job security being picked in the msd.If you have to move to play with the club it should automatically be a year and a half.
Liking the look of Hansen, seems to have the raw tools to work with to transform him into a good pressure small fwd.
So who we taking in the mid season draft?
Reading the tea leaves, we may not get Tucker or Maric..I think one of tucker and Maric in the first round and either Elliot or Stanley in the second if they are still on the board.
No way we will get both tucker and Maric