tigs2010
Pick 1...
Yeah he deserves it too. I'll add him back later when he's served his punishment.even McKercher?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah he deserves it too. I'll add him back later when he's served his punishment.even McKercher?
No Sinclair though. He's getting his junk.Bonner awkwardly prices and a mid but gee in this saints system he will score.
Couldn’t get the pillFeels disgusting that fishers gonna be my f1. I only saw the 1st quarter was Powell not getting cbas after or just not getting the pill?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Is it just me? Or is it just NQR, getting his junk?No Sinclair though. He's getting his junk.
Lot's of players that I had a watch on have confirmed their roles, well for me anyway, pretty much my whole team in fact. Brought in.....Anyone completely nuke their team after this weekend?
I've dumped the following players,
- Adams for Jordon
- Stewart for Daicos
- Butters for Rozee
- Laird for Dawson
- Brayshaw for Martin
- Fyfe for Cam McKenzie
- Macrae for Fisher
- Z Williams for NWM
Call me reactionary but I feel like they are all pretty logical moves aside from maybe the Laird and Stewart outs.
Adams is straight up injured.
Butters will have a niggle coming into round 1.
Brayshaw's role is uncertain with so many Fremantle mids in there.
Fyfe is too handball happy and a big sub risk.
Macrae has had a limited preseason with no practice matches at all. Not to mention, Sanders and Harmes look good so CBA's are unlikely to trend upwards for him.
Zac Williams looks line ball to play the opening rounds.
Hes been that good and being a left footer i think he adds something for them. Sinclair can go into the midfield. Its a risk no doubt but the signs have been promisingNo Sinclair though. He's getting his junk.
So if Simpkin is good for round 1 your thinking Powell will be fine?Tom Powell had 7 CBAs in the first. Then Simpkin went down, Phillips came on and took the CBAs and Powell played the Simpkin role
I've taken him out. Had him last year and was all over the shop.So if Simpkin is good for round 1 your thinking Powell will be fine?
and he's getting better at it - to be fairSeems a similar role, score has been inflated by the goals and free kicks for
Grundy will tell us himself at about 10.30pm on Thursday.Xerri or Grundy for R2 going to be a tough call.
Oh absolutely, probably my favourite Saints player currently.and he's getting better at it - to be fair
So was his head, starting that way again poor bloke.I've taken him out. Had him last year and was all over the shop.
He definitely looks good. He actually provides a nice alternative to Fyfe with Wilson putting his hand up as fieldable.Hes been that good and being a left footer i think he adds something for them. Sinclair can go into the midfield. Its a risk no doubt but the signs have been promising
Can't handle the burden of my team the poor bastard.So was his head, starting that way again poor bloke.
Rankine and Bowes? I had them both but neither really confirmed muchLot's of players that I had a watch on have confirmed their roles, well for me anyway, pretty much my whole team in fact. Brought in.....
Martin
Newcombe
Fisher
Rankine
Jordon
Wines
Bowes
Marshall
Confirmation of rookies on field and bench, although have Laurie and Lohmann on the forward bench, would like to slot Lazzaro instead of Laurie but $26k short and have no idea where to find it.
Yeah, it's a big ask to achieve all that mediocrity. I should knowCan't handle the burden of my team the poor bastard.
And neither will give you any more clues for nearly 13 more days. Bring on Round 0Rankine and Bowes? I had them both but neither really confirmed much
Rankine’s scoring was great but he was playing against the wooden spooners and that game did nothing to tell me if he’ll be consistent. Dawson, Laird and Crouch only played 2/3 of a game each. For his price I’m still very wary.
Bowes was good but only played second half so again it’s hard to know whether he’ll have a consistent role going forward either
So turns out fisher did enough to lock himself in and Powell enough to push himself out of my squad.Fisher and Powell the 2 most interesting for ne
Can fisher force his way in for me (I’m worried about the 3 rebounder mix and half game last week was promising but need to see better insight on the mix)
Is Powell the real deal as a mid rotation and able to hold his place for ne
Also Sheezel, after barnstorming his way into D1 for me last week, does he show again that he is the real deal to step up or do I go back to less premo heavy defence
It’s very easy to get TOO knee jerky post these games with team changes.So turns out fisher did enough to lock himself in and Powell enough to push himself out of my squad.
Sheezel I’m not sure. Prob just enough stay in but not a total lock
LDU I didn’t mention as I didn’t think his firm would sway me (back him in and PS firm meaningless) but I have to admit he did so little that his spot is much more vulnerable and I’ll be a lot more open to teams that don’t have him if alternatives needed to fit in others
And Bonner as a surprise could be in the mix. Feels very pre season reactionary though