Hawked Wings
Team Captain
- May 16, 2021
- 438
- 1,704
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I think Darcy Fogarty is too?It makes sense if we have a RFA in the gun for 2025.
From a quick looking looks like Andy Brayshaw, LDU, Noah Balta are all RFAs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think Darcy Fogarty is too?It makes sense if we have a RFA in the gun for 2025.
From a quick looking looks like Andy Brayshaw, LDU, Noah Balta are all RFAs
Eade and Healy already calling for it:Hope the afl don't reneg on the new ruck rule anytime soon, getting rid of reeves would come back to bite us
But their argument is that tallest player always win.......Eade and Healy already calling for it:
The 2024 rule change former AFL coach wants scrapped next season
“I think it’s taken the art of ruck work out of it and the tallest player wins it.”www.sen.com.au
Yeah, that's fair. I just don't take much notice of what posters hypothetical trades are I guess. My point was more, I don't think we will throw him into a trade as steak knives. If he goes, it will be because he is offered a better deal and playing opportunity elsewhere.Looking at some of the trade hypo's posted here that add Reeves to upgrade our pick 30 to pick in mid-20's, I would disagree with the bolded part. Lots here value him for pick in 40's and hence such trades.
That's even after seeing the Soldo trade that from a points perspective put him at pick 16.
I think he is worth a pick in late 20's as a minimum while Serong & Finn should be early 20's at a minimum if they are on the table.
None of this is about winning trades just valuing players at similar or under to how their peers are valued in the same year or immediate past. I am ok with losing some trades for the greater good.
I am seen.
But their argument is that tallest player always win.......