Hawked Wings
Team Captain
- May 16, 2021
- 439
- 1,705
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I think Darcy Fogarty is too?It makes sense if we have a RFA in the gun for 2025.
From a quick looking looks like Andy Brayshaw, LDU, Noah Balta are all RFAs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think Darcy Fogarty is too?It makes sense if we have a RFA in the gun for 2025.
From a quick looking looks like Andy Brayshaw, LDU, Noah Balta are all RFAs
Eade and Healy already calling for it:Hope the afl don't reneg on the new ruck rule anytime soon, getting rid of reeves would come back to bite us
But their argument is that tallest player always win.......Eade and Healy already calling for it:
The 2024 rule change former AFL coach wants scrapped next season
“I think it’s taken the art of ruck work out of it and the tallest player wins it.”www.sen.com.au
Yeah, that's fair. I just don't take much notice of what posters hypothetical trades are I guess. My point was more, I don't think we will throw him into a trade as steak knives. If he goes, it will be because he is offered a better deal and playing opportunity elsewhere.Looking at some of the trade hypo's posted here that add Reeves to upgrade our pick 30 to pick in mid-20's, I would disagree with the bolded part. Lots here value him for pick in 40's and hence such trades.
That's even after seeing the Soldo trade that from a points perspective put him at pick 16.
I think he is worth a pick in late 20's as a minimum while Serong & Finn should be early 20's at a minimum if they are on the table.
None of this is about winning trades just valuing players at similar or under to how their peers are valued in the same year or immediate past. I am ok with losing some trades for the greater good.
I am seen.
But their argument is that tallest player always win.......
Your first trade I think is a bit overs I thought the trade for Barrass would be those picks without Reeves so he’s essentially free.Going too hard at it:
2024 pick 13 + 2025 1st + Reeves gets Barrass + 2024 pick 23
2024 pick 30 + Serong gets St Kilda pick 24
2024 picks 24, 67 + 2025 3rd round gets Suns 2024 pick 20
2024 draft haul:
Pick 20 = Whitlock #1
pick 23 = Whitlock #2
pick 74 = Bennetts upgrade
Cody Anderson rookie*
Ky Burgoyne rookie
*convinced he'll be a massive steal.
Gawn was the best ruck prior to the rule change, Gawn is the best ruck now. Quality wins out.They should, they just need to be strong enough to hold off their opponent and they're pretty much guaranteed to win.
I be honest, I'm not even really sure what the rule change was?Gawn was the best ruck prior to the rule change, Gawn is the best ruck now. Quality wins out.
The change essentially means you can hold your ground with a straight arm, you couldn't before. Rucks still got away with it occasionally. Gawn used to get pinged for it a fair bit tbh.I be honest, I'm not even really sure what the rule change was?
Cameron was a RFA. Very different to a player currently in contract. Comparing the two trades is asinine.Yes, Cats didn't overpay for Cameron. They held their nerve and managed to get a good deal..we should do the same