A Bit Dusty
2017🏆2019🏆2020🏆
- Oct 6, 2017
- 14,005
- 40,750
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He doesn't have to be the top forward, just has to score enough to be in that keeper range for F3-F6 and I reckon 90+ would do it.Bazlenka has never averaged above 98.6. He's a known butcher, and he's coming back from an ACL. He's a must-have because of his price, and because his ownership is so high, I don't think you can afford to anti-pod him. I'm sure he'll average over 90, but he'll throw in some stinkers and won't be the top fwd. I can see him being a late-out for a rest a couple of times too (in typical Geelong fashion).
I think Rankine and JHF will explode this year and be 10 ppg ahead of the rest (unless of course we get some great DPP additions). They're the clear #1 and #2 fwd imo.
Same as mine. I think it's going to be very popular.
He doesn't have to be the top forward, just has to score enough to be in that keeper range for F3-F6 and I reckon 90+ would do it.
Same criteria for Macrae, Daniel and Phillipou
And for the paltry sum of just over $2.4m
He's an outside accumulator who'll need high TOG and 25-30 touches a game to get in the 90s. Do Geelong and KP allow for that? Time will tell.Yeah can’t see myself passing on him at this point. Thing with him was to score well he was playing nearly 97% game time, not sure he gets that coming back from injury.
But offsetting that is he was so outside @ Dogs and may play more inside @ Cats his ppm may go up and balance it out.
Pou has elite junior scoring pedigree, showed great scoring in the role last year against super tough opposition and is now a year older. Athletic, tall, hard working and great footballer. All the signs are there for me.
I’m happy to make some bold calls every now and then. Laugh at me at the end of the year if he is way off.
How many of that 42% think he will be the top scoring mid though? That was the bold prediction. I’m guessing far call.Picking Pou is not a “bold call”
Currently owned by 42% of coaches
Just 5 on-field rookies .....only query I have is Rivers, seems to be over-valued, with Oliver & Petracca back
How many of that 42% think he will be the top scoring mid though? That was the bold prediction. I’m guessing far call.
F6 = bargain @ $313K.Put your trades where your bold predictions are then
Don’t trade him out all season… Top mid = F1 or F2. Bargainè at 313k
Had smith but went for moore insteadSame as mine. I think it's going to be very popular.
Ohh Im down.Can't wait for us to roughie the f@rk out of each other mate.
Have the same fwd line at this stage as well
F6 = bargain @ $313K.
Wasn’t my bold prediction.Only F6?!
What happened to your bold call that the Pou will be a top scoring MID?
If he’s good enough to be a top 10 mid, he’s definitely going to be your F1
Don’t go backing down from that bold call of yours now…
Haha
I like your thinking.IMHO your flex player will change almost every week. There is no emergency for the flex player so naming someone from the first game is the safest option. If you choose a player from a later game and he is a late out, the options for a trade could be very limited. If you rely on one of your emergencies they can only come from the same position.
Tinker too much and you may end up needing viagra to keep it up.I knew I shouldn’t have set up my team too early - now I’m less likely to be open minded
I can continue to tinker, but it will only be tinkering
My understanding is that Flex will replace your lowest on field score, doesn't need to be a zero for flex to kick in.One thing I am not too clear on yet is do emergencies come onfield first then the calculation for flex then takes effect.
Or is it onfield players then flex is added if a zero score happens then emergencies come onfield in that order.