Lunchtime
Club Legend
- Mar 23, 2024
- 1,733
- 2,895
- AFL Club
- Richmond
So India need as many runs as they scored in the first innings, except they are already half out and all the bats are in the rooms watching.
Thats right
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So India need as many runs as they scored in the first innings, except they are already half out and all the bats are in the rooms watching.
He might have a better record, but for me I'd pick Lee ahead of him any day. Maybe it's nostalgia, maybe I just don't like the guy. I just think Lee had something intangible about him that Starc has never had. Starc drops his head too easy and when he's off his game it's been disastrous for us. Maybe Lee was just better supported with an attack including McGrath and Warne but I feel like he showed his class at the end of his career when he was the leader. Lee/Starc/Cummins all have equal merit to a spot on the team of the 2000s imo. McGrath is the only lock.
Pant will if he doesn't run out of partners but the issue is they are 5 down not 3 down. India are probably regretting not having jadeja at 7 about now.Of course, but their capacity to get that far ahead is what is in question. Would depend almost entirely on Pant producing something even better than Head’s innings
What about Ryan Harris? Gillespie was bloody good alsoHe might have a better record, but for me I'd pick Lee ahead of him any day. Maybe it's nostalgia, maybe I just don't like the guy. I just think Lee had something intangible about him that Starc has never had. Starc drops his head too easy and when he's off his game it's been disastrous for us. Maybe Lee was just better supported with an attack including McGrath and Warne but I feel like he showed his class at the end of his career when he was the leader. Lee/Starc/Cummins all have equal merit to a spot on the team of the 2000s imo. McGrath is the only lock.
I would have replaced Gillespie with Marina Prior. They look the same and she's netting well.What about Ryan Harris? Gillespie was bloody good also
Rhino was awesome but can't seriously pick him ahead of those guys when he only played 27 tests. Gillespie was a great support but was rarely the main man. Probably have him level with Stuart Clark.What about Ryan Harris? Gillespie was bloody good also
Harris could never get his body right. Dizz would be battling to make the 2nd XI of the 20th century.What about Ryan Harris? Gillespie was bloody good also
Don't take much to call white people racist, that's the norm these days.I'm actually rather surprised that no-one from the Indian Management has come out complaining about the racist, obnoxious Australian crowds booing their innocent little cherub, who is rapidly developing form for what is best described as sooky petulance.
You'd think if Pant goes early so do India.India's only hope is the tail wags, Cummins' is asleep at the wheel with field settings and garbage tactics against the tail (not unusual for him) & they can stretch it to the night session with some sort of a lead.
Fair enough, it's all subjective but we'll have to agree to disagree there. Starc has more wickets at a better average and a better strike rate and is a better batter. For mine it's hard to look at their stats and say Lee was a better bowler. Lee also played in gun teams with an all-time pace bowler in McGrath and perhaps the GOAT spinner in Warne.He might have a better record, but for me I'd pick Lee ahead of him any day. Maybe it's nostalgia, maybe I just don't like the guy. I just think Lee had something intangible about him that Starc has never had. Starc drops his head too easy and when he's off his game it's been disastrous for us. Maybe Lee was just better supported with an attack including McGrath and Warne but I feel like he showed his class at the end of his career when he was the leader. Lee/Starc/Cummins all have equal merit to a spot on the team of the 2000s imo. McGrath is the only lock.
Dunno about the last sentence. Hastings is probably the only one that really springs to mind, and played as many Tests as his talents dictated.Fair enough, it's all subjective but we'll have to agree to disagree there. Starc has more wickets at a better average and a better strike rate and is a better batter. For mine it's hard to look at their stats and say Lee was a better bowler. Lee also played in gun teams with an all-time pace bowler in McGrath and perhaps the GOAT spinner in Warne.
Starc has been part of a gun attack for several years, but the first few years of his career he played with a number of bowlers that were barely Test standard.
Pant will if he doesn't run out of partners but the issue is they are 5 down not 3 down. India are probably regretting not having jadeja at 7 about now.
The sad part about that incident was the "Siraj" chant was a sign of respect more than mocking him. IIRC he was bowling with heart and the crowd was feeling it. He's definitely a polarizing figure but I've seen enough gutsy performances to have a wary respect for his heart and ability, suspect the Aussie dressing room does too.No issue with players being the villains, winding up the crowd and feeding off it.
But don't do it if you are going to stop play for 20 minutes and get people thrown out because all they did was call you Shiraz.
This. He’s literally a better batting option than some of their specialists imo. Crazy that he doesn’t get more consideration.
Fair call - a better way of phrasing it was probably that there was a period where our bowling attack isn't nearly what it is now or what it had been prior with Johnson, Harris, Sids and Lyon, hence we saw bowlers like Mennie getting a chance.Dunno about the last sentence. Hastings is probably the only one that really springs to mind, and played as many Tests as his talents dictated.
Hilf, Sids, Johnson, Lyon, Harris, Pattinson. Hilf and Patto if you were being overly harsh, but both very fine bowlers, and certainly better than barely Test standard.
Watson was a batting all rounder.
He didn't?Not sure why Trav is having a sook about the send off in the post day 2 interviews tbh we have a history littered with send offs, huffing and puffing & swearing so just suck it up.
disadvantage of playing Ashwin over Jadeja is they're down one less batsmanYou'd think if Pant goes early so do India.
Rhino was awesome but can't seriously pick him ahead of those guys when he only played 27 tests. Gillespie was a great support but was rarely the main man. Probably have him level with Stuart Clark.
It is a shame about Rhino's body failing him. Could have been an all-time great for us with some more luck.So Ryan Harris plays 27 tests and that is not enough for serious consideration, but Clark plays 24 test and that is enough to have him level with Gillespie? Strange criteria you have.
I find their line up choices very odd for this series.