Certified Legendary Thread 34 Essendon* Players suspended for doping violations - No opposition fans. Check OP for thread rules

If Essendon* gets slapped on the wrist with a wet lettuce leaf, I will .......


  • Total voters
    250
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
So *FC have put Brad Sewell on the selection panel for a new coach, why would they not use one of their past great players, like um, James Hird
Hird Sheedy was overlooked as well.
Madden would have been a reasonable choice. But anything Hawthorn is the new black apparently.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I'm surprised that Sewell agreed, considering that this team's captain -that sniping dog Lloyd- ran through him a few years back.
 
why does Essendon always get the asterisk*? I always assumed it was because of the injection regime but then I read a thread from about 2005 that also referred to Essendon*....
 
why does Essendon always get the asterisk*? I always assumed it was because of the injection regime but then I read a thread from about 2005 that also referred to Essendon*....
Won* their 1993 flag whilst oven the salary cap.

Two other premierships have been handed to them when grand finals werent played in that year.

And they are epitome of evil!!!
 
1993 huh? nope, don't recall this at all. Let's not talk of it again.
Mention 1993 to an * supporter, they instantly jam their fingers in their ears and start screaming "LALALALALALALALALALALA I can't hear you" before curling into the fetal position sobbing uncontrollably.
 
Hard thing to turn on the club, but stick by your mates. What is one in the same when one of the same is the same. Ooooh, philosophical proposition...

Hopefully WADA makes the passage easier for those in a system defined by "trust."

I do feel for the players, but they took the shots.
 


These were the days. I can just imagine Hirdy's face while watching it live on tv. ****ing scum the lot of them.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

why does Essendon always get the asterisk*? I always assumed it was because of the injection regime but then I read a thread from about 2005 that also referred to Essendon*....

2013 AFL Ladder, R23. A work of art.

afl23.jpg
 
"Taylor said he was not an Essendon member but had met with the club in 2013 and called for an extraordinary general meeting. He had wanted the Bombers to appoint counsel to investigate whether there had been "wrongdoing" by the AFL. "
Interestng way for a lawyer to make $, start a case and seek public funding from disgruntled * supporters. Maybe the truth will come out? But the comedy Gold rolls on:p
 
Not sure * club or supporters have much interest left in throwing more bucks at this. May not have any choice but.
He might not have a choice either when he loses the Pies gig, not sure anyone else would be desperate enough to give him another chance. Could be a match made in heaven.
 
"Taylor said he was not an Essendon member but had met with the club in 2013 and called for an extraordinary general meeting. He had wanted the Bombers to appoint counsel to investigate whether there had been "wrongdoing" by the AFL. "
Interestng way for a lawyer to make $, start a case and seek public funding from disgruntled * supporters. Maybe the truth will come out? But the comedy Gold rolls on:p
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...-in-asada-stoush/story-fnca0u4y-1227081844127

"Jackson Taylor, an Essendon member leading the push for an EGM..."
He's an offended Hirdite and probably has no end game other than poking a stick at the big meanies that are the AFL.

EDIT: When did b***hurt become offensive? I'm assuming there was a mod edit made there?
 
Last edited:
What? I don't get this. Who's the plaintiff? The lawyer? Surely a judge wouldn't let a random person start legal action against the league without reasonable grounds?
Don't get me wrong, it's hilarious, but seriously?

You can issue a Writ saying anything you want. But it's just a bloke who is either (a) pulling a PR stunt and/or (b) has lost his mind.

It's going to be laughed out. Even if he establishes the 'breaches' he still has to how he has suffered a loss that can be quantified.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top