Certified Legendary Thread 4th Test Border Gavaskar Trophy December 26-30 1000hrs @ the MCG

[ElliottsMaggies]

This is spiralling into the abyss.

How about everyone takes a deep breath.

It was a fun thread & we were enjoying all the oppo footy fans being united until R&S entered the chat. He even trolls our board just being a contrarian.

 

[Borisdog]

OK, I'm going to try to give you a pretty reasoned response even though you didn't tag me .

It's the latter . Watch the replay a few times and use your experience playing ( if you did ) . It's a classic off the glove deflection from a hook/pull shot down the leg side.
It probably even glanced the the splice on the way through .
Watch the trajectory of the ball from contact to the keeper .
It slows up at point of where it did/would make contact from the glove.

It's not unusual that he may not have felt this . The gloves now around the thumb are pretty solid so even a half decent contact with him swivelling around as the ball come past may not register with him.

100% no doubt he was out .

Yeah good response

Showed more patience than I was capable of.

 

[HK_Hawk]

lololol that line is more bent the bumrahs armView attachment 2195497

BUT, a fair hyperextension only.

 

[QuietB]

Nah next captain is marnus

Imagine - he’d use a review on the umpires watch when they call lunch

 

[Run n Spread]

How about we all be cool?

Ok
western royboy Adelaide Hawk PhatBoy
Your decision these been a bit of conjecture on these boards day 5.
Jaiswal dismissal day 5 hooking given not out reviewed.
Your decisions?
A= not out
B= Inconclusive umpires call
C= overturn out
Replays probably up onyou tube or fox by now.
I'll happily shut up.and accept their call
For the record I think inconclusive and should've stayed not out.

 

[Linda Lovelace]

Clearly they change strategy after Pant got out but we bowled well and took wickets. Both Reddy and Jadeja didn't get out to poor shots, Jaiswal was probably tired and saw a chance to score.

I haven't heard the direct quote, just 2nd hand, so I shouldn't have commented in the first place.

 

[PhatBoy]

Translates to can anyone who also does not like the Aussies please help me here!

Stay on Reddit for the support you crave and stick to posting pictures of your latest Vindaloo.

really?

 

[Run n Spread]

Yep, that’s right, AND… we got away with it. We cheated and won. EAD!

You are a literal **** wit

 

[chickenonachain]

It appears to graze the bat but no way you over turn it on that vision. And I'm biased against batsmen.
There was no deflection. Check your glasses or comment when sober.
Granted the whole match was riddled with bad decisions but to overturn that on day 5 was horse shit.

Mate you are an idiot

 

[beside the seaside]

Just watching the last session again. Pants shot was terrible. Why hit it in the air?

 

[grumbleguts]

Watching it now. What deflection? Maybe by 1 mm. Your eyes are playing tricks

You're either a poor troll or a f**king imbecile. Watch until they show ball tracking and tell me it didn't deviate.

 

[Black Diamond]

Some player rankings in order:

Pass mark and well done:

1. Smith
2. Cummins
3. Labuschagne
4. Starc
5. Carey

Pass mark and keep at it:

6. Khawaja
7. Boland
8. Lyon
9. Konstas

Fail but safe:

10. Head

Fail and done:

11. Marsh

 

[HK_Hawk]

You are a literal **** wit

Yes… AND WE WON

 

[PhatBoy]

Ok
western royboy Adelaide Hawk PhatBoy
Your decision these been a bit of conjecture on these boards day 5.
Jaiswal dismissal day 5 hooking given not out reviewed.
Your decisions?
A= not out
B= Inconclusive umpires call
C= overturn out
Replays probably up onyou tube or fox by now.
I'll happily shut up.and accept their call
For the record I think inconclusive and should've stayed not out.

I would overturn it.

Conclusive evidence doesn’t have to exclude what you can see with your eyes. You regularly hear third umpires say ‘ok clear gap between bat and pad no need for RTS’ or ‘clear deflection’ etc so as far as I was concerned there was a very small but clear deflection. I had no problem with it

 

[outabounds]

Some player rankings in order:

Pass mark and well done:

1. Smith
2. Cummins
3. Labuschagne
4. Starc
5. Carey

Pass mark and keep at it:

6. Khawaja
7. Boland
8. Lyon
9. Konstas

Fail but safe:

10. Head

Fail and done:

11. Marsh

Bit harsh in Boland. He was magnificent.

On Pixel 7 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Mr Meow]

Ok
western royboy Adelaide Hawk PhatBoy
Your decision these been a bit of conjecture on these boards day 5.
Jaiswal dismissal day 5 hooking given not out reviewed.
Your decisions?
A= not out
B= Inconclusive umpires call
C= overturn out
Replays probably up onyou tube or fox by now.
I'll happily shut up.and accept their call
For the record I think inconclusive and should've stayed not out.

D) That's enough beers for today

It's fine, we've all been there. Cuppa and straight to bed should sort you out.

 

[TigerCraig]

There go all the reviews inside of 5 balls

EFA

 

[Black Diamond]

Bit harsh in Boland. He was magnificent.

On Pixel 7 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app

You’re right. I have misremembered and he should be in the top group.

 

[PhatBoy]

Not sure if it’s been mentioned here yet, but Rohit said in the press conference that the team strategy was to go for the win in the last session, hence Pant and Jaiswal teeing off. Absolutely idiotic stuff, basically asking to get the sack with tactics like that when they were no chance of getting those runs.

Not sure what he said in the actual presser but in the post match interview with Isa he said they wanted to win from the start and try to conserve wickets to go for the win but I don’t think At any stage he mentioned that he thought they got themselves in a position to actually do it - ie. yes win at the start if we could get to lunch relatively unscathed but we didn’t so from there it was draw the game

 

[grumbleguts]

Yeah, look, he trolls the Collingwood board from time to time. Definitely not one of us.

You should get better lawyers, what a cretin.

 

[Stax on the mill]

Maybe I've tagged 3 random thou who seem to know their stuff. I'm interested in what they say.
Not out/umpires call/overturned out?
Maybe my eyes are playing tricks. I'm calling it inconclusive umpires call and not out

 

[Run n Spread]

Not you

 

[sherb]

Ok
western royboy Adelaide Hawk PhatBoy
Your decision these been a bit of conjecture on these boards day 5.
Jaiswal dismissal day 5 hooking given not out reviewed.
Your decisions?
A= not out
B= Inconclusive umpires call
C= overturn out
Replays probably up onyou tube or fox by now.
I'll happily shut up.and accept their call
For the record I think inconclusive and should've stayed not out.

Disappointed you forgot me.

A clear deflection, could only be from the bat/glove, out.

So C it is.

 

[Mr Meow]

**** off idiot. I posted one opinion which I'm happy to be corrected on. And all the ****wits on this board attack me rather than debate the game.

Not attacking you at all buddy - it's clear you hit the sauce a bit hard today and your basic understanding of physics, moving images etc is not as strong as it would usually be.

 

[Riviat]

Random fact: Joel Wilson is the first umpire to have 100 player reviews successfully overturn his decisions. This was from the India v England series earlier in the year too