Abbott: "Warmer when Jesus was a boy"

[Dippers Donuts]

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Christy

In a 2007 editorial in the Wall Street Journal, he wrote: "I'm sure the majority (but not all) of my IPCC colleagues cringe when I say this, but I see neither the developing catastrophe nor the smoking gun proving that human activity is to blame for most of the warming we see."

This quote was taken from the Wall Street Journal on November 1st, 2007 from an article titiled "My Nobel Moment" (unfortunately behind a paywall).

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119387567378878423.html

Comment is confirmed here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1919858/posts
Also here: http://blog.tomevslin.com/2007/11/cause-for-globa.html
Also here: http://hectorowen.blogspot.com/2007/11/ipcc-scientists-against-gore.html
So once again, the brainwashed congregation of the global warming religion have been debunked and their bodies of posts strawn in tatters much like their beliefs.

How sad is it when grin continues to push robyn william's propaganda over and over again after it has been shown that williams is nothing more than an another global warming cultist with beliefs that defy what the science is showing.

Poptech has won this argument and its time that the penny wong fan club move on before they are embarrassed any further by their blunders.

Hey hawker, apparently Anfernee watts is in town. You seeing him?
the average age of attendees is about 65 i believe...is that you. what about that northern hemisphere station analysis? can you ask him about that?
Hows it going.

 

[Dippers Donuts]

Dipstick, so I take it you do support Dr. Christy's explicity position on the issue. Good at least you can now stop spreading lies about him due to your lack of research abilities. Glad I could be of service to correct more of your misinformation.

Heres a clue fool.
He aint quite on your side.
Hey ********, are you denying AGW?

 

[Poptech]

Heres a clue fool.
He aint quite on your side.
Hey ********, are you denying AGW?

Do you support his position, yes or no? I don't answer questions with the word "deny" in them.

 

[Hawkamania!]

Hey hawker, apparently Anfernee watts is in town. You seeing him?
the average age of attendees is about 65 i believe...is that you. what about that northern hemisphere station analysis? can you ask him about that?
Hows it going.

I would if I was able to.

I went to a function last week with most people aged between 20 and 40. The subject of global warming came out and thanks to my Android phone with internet access, people became better informed on the subject. A few were angry at the agw propaganda spun by governments and the media afterwards.

From my experience, facts can be useful in educating people on the dangers of the F.U.D propaganda tactics that are used by your idols. Only fools seem to be immune to understanding facts based on evidence.

Instead of seeing Anthony Watts live, I'll just have to settle with having fun with the members of the Alliance of Village Idiots such as yourself.

 

[Dippers Donuts]

I would if I was able to.

I went to a function last week with most people aged between 20 and 40. The subject of global warming came out and thanks to my Android phone with internet access, people became better informed on the subject. A few were angry at the agw propaganda spun by governments and the media afterwards.

From my experience, facts can be useful in educating people on the dangers of the F.U.D propaganda tactics that are used by your idols. Only fools seem to be immune to understanding facts based on evidence.

Instead of seeing Anthony Watts live, I'll just have to settle with having fun with the members of the Alliance of Village Idiots such as yourself.

what a fool you are then.

can you spin this?

http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/global_warming_misinformation_sea_ice_increasing.html

Sigh i guess not. Keep plugging away kid.

 

[Dippers Donuts]

Do you support his position, yes or no? I don't answer questions with the word "deny" in them.

Piss off then spambot.
He is not on your side fool. Get it?

 

[Hawkamania!]

Oh look its the spam bot.
Christys wiki link still says this.

"It is scientifically inconceivable that after changing forests into cities, turning millions of acres into irrigated farmland, putting massive quantities of soot and dust into the air, and putting extra greenhouse gases into the air, that the natural course of climate has not changed in some way."

Epic fail spam bot.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Christy

In a 2007 editorial in the Wall Street Journal, he wrote: "I'm sure the majority (but not all) of my IPCC colleagues cringe when I say this, but I see neither the developing catastrophe nor the smoking gun proving that human activity is to blame for most of the warming we see."

This quote was taken from the Wall Street Journal on November 1st, 2007 from an article titiled "My Nobel Moment" (unfortunately behind a paywall).

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119387567378878423.html

Comment is confirmed here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1919858/posts
Also here: http://blog.tomevslin.com/2007/11/cause-for-globa.html
Also here: http://hectorowen.blogspot.com/2007/11/ipcc-scientists-against-gore.html
So once again, the brainwashed congregation of the global warming religion have been debunked and their bodies of posts strawn in tatters much like their beliefs.

How sad is it when grin continues to push robyn william's propaganda over and over again after it has been shown that williams is nothing more than an another global warming cultist with beliefs that defy what the science is showing.

Poptech has won this argument and its time that the penny wong fan club move on before they are embarrassed any further by their blunders.

I'm still waiting for you to comment on this. Poptech has shown you up as the charlatan that you are. You bring nothing to the debate except childish attacks and propaganda spun by the un and their minions.

You are right about mentioning the epic spambot fail. Although you are incorrect as it was more of an assessment of your own multiple repeated fails.