- Oct 8, 2009
- 29,910
- 28,072
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Trust the AFL to turn a good idea into an oversaturated commercialised thing.
WTF are they doing?
Maybe we should turn each round into a travelling circus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trust the AFL to turn a good idea into an oversaturated commercialised thing.
WTF are they doing?
Maybe we should turn each round into a travelling circus.
Wrote this in the other thread, but I'll just repost here:I do find it interesting they are think of the Sydney one being held at Easter.
When the only other major ground beside the SCG will be, ummm, unavailable.
Ahh so that will be their AFLW and VFL ground.Wrote this in the other thread, but I'll just repost here:
6-7 games per round in that proposal. The SCG would host most games (including GWS), but Showring Oval right next door is getting done up to hold ~10k so that could host one or two smaller drawing games.
That’s fair enough, and great the AFL are trying something to remedy this.The fact that the Giants have always been invisible in their home town during Easter, because of ground availability, is probably something being addressed with this idea. Just look at the 2024 fixture: 1 AFL game in NSW (Syd v GC) between March 23 and May 4.
It’s 3 games spread out and each is in completely different states.Dunno why but I thought of the Big Bash and their season extensions in the past.
More of a good thing isn't always best. Will loose its shine pretty quick
How can they justify putting a gather round in vic? Whats the logic there? Theres almost a gather round in Vic most weeks anyway, so theyll do 3-4 games in vic and 3-4 in tas?
Why bother making it a gather round? just schedule a few games in Tassy and carry on as usual.
Surely the logical idea if 3 gather rounds was locked in would be WA, SA and NSW. WA and SA need more attention than bloody Vic
If you are standing still you are actually going backwards.The constant need to create new and unnecessary innovations is surely at breaking point.
So if they just scheduled 3-4 games in Tasmania they wouldnt need a "gather round". Hell, do 3-4 games there 2 weeks in a row so most teams get to play down there each year.Hobart too small to host one on their own.
Wrote this in the other thread but I'll just repost here:How can they justify putting a gather round in vic? Whats the logic there? Theres almost a gather round in Vic most weeks anyway, so theyll do 3-4 games in vic and 3-4 in tas?
Why bother making it a gather round? just schedule a few games in Tassy and carry on as usual.
Surely the logical idea if 3 gather rounds was locked in would be WA, SA and NSW. WA and SA need more attention than bloody Vic
Seems like a necessity born out of maths.The constant need to create new and unnecessary innovations is surely at breaking point.
Perhaps a Round minus zero is called forSeems like a necessity born out of maths.
Can't have an odd-number of games when you have an odd-number of teams. So when Tassie joins, they've either gotta go back to 22 games per team (and lose all the money from the extra round), or move up to 24.
Obviously they're going to choose 24, which creates an issue of early season ground availability. Cue the need to morph Opening Round into another Gather Round.
if its all but one game in Tas its not so bad, at least its in a developing areaWrote this in the other thread but I'll just repost here:
The proposal had the whole opening round in Tassie, except for the first game in Geelong. The Cats and Devils would get HGA against the Swans and Giants, and then have return fixtures in the Sydney round to balance it out.
Is that not warranted?WA melts in 3..2..1..