BIGHAWK23
Premiership Player
- Nov 7, 2019
- 3,234
- 8,839
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
You don’t seriously think “umpires call” on DRS is in reference to the actual reasoning from the umpire?Ball tracking showed that in line, but 'umpires call ' for height.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You don’t seriously think “umpires call” on DRS is in reference to the actual reasoning from the umpire?Ball tracking showed that in line, but 'umpires call ' for height.
Going down leg on that review was my second line of thinking , definitely not my first.You don’t seriously think “umpires call” on DRS is in reference to the actual reasoning from the umpire?
Yes, but you're not umpire Wilson.Going down leg on that review was my second line of thinking , definitely not my first.
Again, you don’t seriously think the “umpires call” is in reference to the umpires reasoning behind it being not outGoing down leg on that review was my second line of thinking , definitely not my first.
The comms even mentioned first thing when they say that was the height.Again, you don’t seriously think the “umpires call” is in reference to the umpires reasoning behind it being not out
If it was just outside the line (umpires call), and everything else was green, it would be out because Wilson said it was missing, not outside the line
Surely not?
Good judges may have given that not out on height. Bighawk is saying Wilson is not a good judge and gave it not out on line.The comms even mentioned first thing when they say that was the height.
PS: Hazlewood deserved that wicket.
My interpretation with LBW when they go to the review is they look at the 3 main things:
1. Height
2. Whether the ball pitched in the 'corridor' of the stumps
3. Initial impact of where the ball hit the pads.
Not in any particular order either.
OK I would make a bad umpire.That Abbott one looked close. but they looked higher on initial inspection that the previous one.
Umpires decision is basically a failsafe for system errorMy interpretation with LBW when they go to the review is they look at the 3 main things:
1. Height
2. Whether the ball pitched in the 'corridor' of the stumps
3. Initial impact of where the ball hit the pads.
Not in any particular order either.
Ive seen some LBWs been given out where the ball pitched outside the corridor of the stumps. Not quite sure if I fully understand the rules in that regard.
As is Mitch Marsh it seemsAaron Hardie is a better seam option than Sean Abbott in this format.
If Abbott wasn't from NSW he wouldn't have got more than a game or 2 for AustraliaThere are better pacemen in domestic cricket I feel better than Abbott. Behrendorff, Jhye Richardson, Neser, even Elliott, Thornton to name a few.