- Banned
- #1
Is it fair to say that there is a vastly different attitude towards Ben Cousins than there was 12 months ago among the football public?
It seems like most punters want to see Ben Cousins come back and play good footy. Hell, the Richmond fans are all over this as a human interest story — it's all about redemption, courage in adversity and facing your demons.
I wonder if they were as warm as fuzzy a year ago.
As I recall, when Cousins was arrested on that Perth street, there was very little sympathy for him. He had had enough chances. He was a selfish w***er. Good riddance.
But 12 months on, that has softened. Why?
Among Richmond fans, the answer is simple. Suddenly, there's something in it for them. They've been persuaded to love Cousins by the promise of getting a good player for nothing. That was quick, wasn't it?
But among the neutrals, what's changed? Has Cousins done something to persuade people? Has he beared his soul and begged for forgiveness? What brought about the shift in public sentiment?
The answer, of course, is absolutely nothing has changed.
Cousins is still the same cocksure creature he was 12 months ago. He hasn't offered any real contrition. He's the same guy who drew howls of judgement from every quarter. He's the same guy everyone loved to hate, only no-one really seems to feel that way anymore.
Why?
If there were good reasons to despise Cousins 12 months ago, aren't those reasons still valid? I don't understand how they can have evaporated, when Cousins hasn't really done anything to appease people.
It seems people just got bored of being judgemental, and decided that it would actually be more interesting if Cousins was allowed back. It just goes to show that all the self-righteous conviction that sprung up in condemnation of Cousins was little more than hot air. It all got blown away once the wind changed.
It seems like most punters want to see Ben Cousins come back and play good footy. Hell, the Richmond fans are all over this as a human interest story — it's all about redemption, courage in adversity and facing your demons.
I wonder if they were as warm as fuzzy a year ago.
As I recall, when Cousins was arrested on that Perth street, there was very little sympathy for him. He had had enough chances. He was a selfish w***er. Good riddance.
But 12 months on, that has softened. Why?
Among Richmond fans, the answer is simple. Suddenly, there's something in it for them. They've been persuaded to love Cousins by the promise of getting a good player for nothing. That was quick, wasn't it?
But among the neutrals, what's changed? Has Cousins done something to persuade people? Has he beared his soul and begged for forgiveness? What brought about the shift in public sentiment?
The answer, of course, is absolutely nothing has changed.
Cousins is still the same cocksure creature he was 12 months ago. He hasn't offered any real contrition. He's the same guy who drew howls of judgement from every quarter. He's the same guy everyone loved to hate, only no-one really seems to feel that way anymore.
Why?
If there were good reasons to despise Cousins 12 months ago, aren't those reasons still valid? I don't understand how they can have evaporated, when Cousins hasn't really done anything to appease people.
It seems people just got bored of being judgemental, and decided that it would actually be more interesting if Cousins was allowed back. It just goes to show that all the self-righteous conviction that sprung up in condemnation of Cousins was little more than hot air. It all got blown away once the wind changed.