Byron Schammer V Daniel Harris

[Skooks]

I'd Say Schammer; looks neat and tidy, and looks to be a great player of the future

 

[X_box_X]

Two very contrasting game styles, but both are good midfielders.

Harris loves doing the hard stuff, and his tough-as-nails attitude on the footy gives him a strong physical presence. He is the one getting to the bottom of packs and firing out handballs to his teammates. He is your typical crash and bash midfielder and is a terrific extractor of the sherrin. Keep in mind that Harris spends quite a bit of time on the bench.

Schammer, on the other hand, loves creating play and getting out in to wide open space, where he puts the pedal to the metal and just accelerates with sheer ease. A very exciting player with a fairly reliable disposal. He isn't as experienced as Harris, so in time you would only expect Schammer to become better.

At the moment, though, Harris takes the cake for mine. I like both players and it's hard to predict who will end up having the better career, given Harris is more experienced.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Two very contrasting game styles, but both are good midfielders.

Harris loves doing the hard stuff, and his tough-as-nails attitude on the footy gives him a strong physical presence. He is the one getting to the bottom of packs and firing out handballs to his teammates. He is your typical crash and bash midfielder and is a terrific extractor of the sherrin. Keep in mind that Harris spends quite a bit of time on the bench.

Schammer, on the other hand, loves creating play and getting out in to wide open space, where he puts the pedal to the metal and just accelerates with sheer ease. A very exciting player with a fairly reliable disposal. He isn't as experienced as Harris, so in time you would only expect Schammer to become better.

At the moment, though, Harris takes the cake for mine. I like both players and it's hard to predict who will end up having the better career, given Harris is more experienced.

Very good post

 

[Z_K]

Not really a fair poll is it?

Harro has had 2 more years in the system and they are fundamentally differen't footballers with opposing strengths.

But yes, Harris playing well = North wins so Harris for me.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Not really a fair poll is it?

Harro has had 2 more years in the system and they are fundamentally differen't footballers with opposing strengths.

But yes, Harris playing well = North wins so Harris for me.

Why isnt it a fair poll? If anything people would be biased towards harris as people dont watch many fremantle games

 

[Leg_Spinning_Sensation]

Schammer is a gun who has just been getting better and better. Harris because he plays at the Roos has limted coverage but he is a good player though i would take Schammer

 

[benno87]

How Schammer is winning this is beyond me.

Connolly would take the even trade in a second.

 

[pinkus maximus]

No he wouldnt. We have enough slow inside midfielders thankyou

 

[Cassius_Clay]

How Schammer is winning this is beyond me.

Connolly would take the even trade in a second.

No need to be biased

 

[benno87]

No he wouldnt. We have enough slow inside midfielders thankyou

But you do not have enough players capable of winning an immense amount of clearances of either ruckman and giving your quality onballers first use of the football.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

But you do not have enough players capable of winning an immense amount of clearances of either ruckman and giving your quality onballers first use of the football.

I think freo would still rather Schammer

 

[windyhill]

Been on the Harro bandwagon from day one....

 

[hilly]

Not one Kangaroos player would get a game for the Dockers

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Not one Kangaroos player would get a game for the Dockers

Surely 3 or 4 would

 

[benno87]

Been on the Harro bandwagon from day one....

Interesting point is a lot of Essendon guys I talk to really rate Daniel Harris' game and have a lot of positive things to say about him. Not to sure what the trend is there but just something i've picked up.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Interesting point is a lot of Essendon guys I talk to really rate Daniel Harris' game and have a lot of positive things to say about him. Not to sure what the trend is there but just something i've picked up.

Why is that I wonder

 

[2notepockets]

schammer will be better than harris

 

[Lidge]

Lay down misere. Harris.

Harris & Mitchell would be the only fair comparison - play a similiar game, although I rate Harris higher as he's more damaging & has that X factor (vision in traffic). Last week versus Port Adelaide - in a heavy contest, and by hand finds Troy Makepeace running full tilt to win the game.

Stats are misleading. If Harris played full game time - he'd be leading clearances & possibly stats in the comp (which he did last year, on a per minute basis).

Harris...is the nearest thing we've seen to a clone of Greg Williams. Big call....but North watchers will most likely agree.

 

[RoosLuver]

Been on the Harro bandwagon from day one....

Me too!.

 

[HIG]

Lay down misere. Harris.

Harris & Mitchell would be the only fair comparison - play a similiar game, although I rate Harris higher as he's more damaging & has that X factor (vision in traffic). Last week versus Port Adelaide - in a heavy contest, and by hand finds Troy Makepeace running full tilt to win the game.

Stats are misleading. If Harris played full game time - he'd be leading clearances & possibly stats in the comp (which he did last year, on a per minute basis).

Harris...is the nearest thing we've seen to a clone of Greg Williams. Big call....but North watchers will most likely agree.

You haven't seen Mitchell enough...he's easily a superior footballer - and Mick Malthouse actually used your Greg Williams comparison to compare with Sammy earlier in the year.

There's a reason Sam's called the 'Blond Diesel' and 'The Extractor' - he's the best there is, and your mob seriously overrate Harris.

Oh, and since Mitchell's injury five weeks ago, it's Hodge, not Harris who's lead the league in clearances.

 

[inferno66]

your mob seriously overrate Harris.

So true... if Harris was the next Williams why doesnt he have more game time

 

[apollo_creed]

So true... if Harris was the next Williams why doesnt he have more game time

Fitness twithead. Not 100%. Simple enough for ya ********?

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Is this one of the closest polls EVER?

 

[HIG]

Fitness twithead. Not 100%. Simple enough for ya ********?

So he's been injury prone his entire career?

Or perhaps he's never been any more than a handy impact player.

On output it's hard to see how Roos supporters continually argue otherwise.

 

[apollo_creed]

So he's been injury prone his entire career?

Or perhaps he's never been any more than a handy impact player.

On output it's hard to see how Roos supporters continually argue otherwise.

Its funny because he averages more clearances per minutes on ground than Mitchell in the last 2 years.