The state of the midfield is definitely the big focus after 3 losses on the trot, and rightly so.
Blicavs and Atkins are meat and potatoes mids; both are capable of getting hot from time to time but mostly they're grafters; every team needs those types (and we're all well-versed in Blicavs' versatility, too) but they can't be the main show if we're fair dinkum about contending.
Dangerfield, Cam Guthrie and Mitch Duncan will all be welcome returns to our depleted team, but all 3 have had long careers and have clocked up a lot of mileage. Of course they will improve this team - but they need to be managed shrewdly from here on in.
Isaac Smith is going great, no problems with him at present.
Brandan Parfitt used to be a player I held high hopes for, but his confidence looks shot. I don't want to make excuses for him, but I noticed his thumb heavily strapped again tonight - am I right in thinking he has broken it more than once? Anyway; my expectations of him have diminished dramatically.
Tanner Bruhn's 16 disposal game was a mixed bag; his demeanor sometimes suggests that he knows very well he's not quite where he wants to be in terms of his ability to consistently impact. Time is on his side - but senior games should not be a ''given''.
To date Bruhn reminds me a bit of Josh Caddy when we got him from Gold Coast - many of us weren't quite sure what we were getting, and it took a while to get a gauge on just how capable he was of making an impact.
A fit, freed-up Max Holmes could be one of the funnest features of Geelong moving forward; I'm not sure the view that he has Dangerfield-like Inside/Outside qualities; if allowed to receive and run though he could be a nice point of differentiation.
To my eyes Mitch Knevitt is the one who has really put his hand up over this lean spell.
Got caught turning back into traffic tonight in our D50; cost us a shot on goal, but you can forgive that when he hasn't even played 10 senior games yet.
Knevitt's already shown a knack for taking a strong overhead mark, his stamina appears to be strong, and he's a big framed kid.
If we get the lot back fit and firing things could snowball, but the wear and tear on the aforementioned Dangerfield, Duncan and Guthrie makes this ''perfect world'' scenario less and less likely. Still; even 2 of those players at close to their best would be very, very handy right now.
TB will either slowly get better or hit a ceiling ..as it appears Parfitt has. Either way ..he is well worth the addition to our list. Not every recruit becomes Danger. On earning it . Yes.I agree not given. I think of selection sometimes back when some critiqued Mench.. I agree that he does this or that but who is a better option. For the moment he has it.. but id think the RD will be thinking tehy need to keep ading talent.. as well as guys like Clark will come hard. A harder eye can be used when all are available and when he matures.. but he is on 21 and only played 38 games. Does he have something that will seperate him from a solid group of players that we start to develop? We will see,
I have liked MK from pe drafting him. His marking is his something that separates him imo.. it could see him play multiple roles eventually ..he need to get bigger and stronger... and id like to see him polish his kicking as he will get asked at some stage to play forward.... but the marks he is taking now gives one hope once he is stronger... it will be the other who get pushed out by him.