Speculation Chad Warner

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

agree on the Judd deal that's why I explained it with context.
Offering Hawks 1st and WC F1st is absolute top value.
No more and if that's the deal WC should be asking for something back imo, F2nd.
It all depends on where the hawks finish .

If they miss finals and its top 10 pick it is a very good pick
 
It all depends on where the hawks finish .

If they miss finals and its top 10 pick it is a very good pick
I dont think Sydney will give a shit

You cant offer 1+ mill per year to a guy and say "Take our 2nd best first rounder". Common sense says that isnt a thing
 
I dont think Sydney will give a shit

You cant offer 1+ mill per year to a guy and say "Take our 2nd best first rounder". Common sense says that isnt a thing
Common sense says hawks wouldn't trade pick 14 last trade period but they did and they added to their draft hand

Geelong hawks essendon and Port would do it .

If chad picks us and our pick offer is better than anything freo can offer why not?

We play mr nice guy at the detriment of the quality of the list .

Sydney get enough of a leg up from the afl so I wouldn't care . They will be a top team again next season and they already get access to a top 5 pick .
 
Common sense says hawks wouldn't trade pick 14 last trade period but they did and they added to their draft hand

Geelong hawks essendon and Port would do it .

If chad picks us and our pick offer is better than anything freo can offer why not?

We play mr nice guy at the detriment of the quality of the list .

Sydney get enough of a leg up from the afl so I wouldn't care . They will be a top team again next season and they already get access to a top 5 pick .
Realistically if we played Mr Nice Guy over freakin Liam Baker we dont have much of a leg to stand on here.

You want us to negotiate from a power of immense weakness.

We need to stop playing Mr Nice Guy but I can round of 5+ other places we need to do this before we do it at the trade table for a guy like Chad Warner and haggling over a small win at the trade table
 
Common sense says hawks wouldn't trade pick 14 last trade period but they did and they added to their draft hand

Geelong hawks essendon and Port would do it .

If chad picks us and our pick offer is better than anything freo can offer why not?

We play mr nice guy at the detriment of the quality of the list .

Sydney get enough of a leg up from the afl so I wouldn't care . They will be a top team again next season and they already get access to a top 5 pick .

Outside of everything else, who is this magical top 5 academy pick?

Watched a large amount of u18s and what not and not sure we have a top five prospect as it stands.
 
Realistically if we played Mr Nice Guy over freakin Liam Baker we dont have much of a leg to stand on here.

You want us to negotiate from a power of immense weakness.

We need to stop playing Mr Nice Guy but I can round of 5+ other places we need to do this before we do it at the trade table for a guy like Chad Warner and haggling over a small win at the trade table
Hopefully we don't see a repeat of matt Clarke being chummy to his old Richmond mates . It was a terrible look .
 
Outside of everything else, who is this magical top 5 academy pick?

Watched a large amount of u18s and what not and not sure we have a top five prospect as it stands.
Someone else said youb had a top 5 pick next year . Lots of water to go under the bridge .

By the look of it you have 3 in the top 30 so will need lots of points
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Noah Chamberlain is likely to be the first Swans NGA to attract a bid which I suspect is likely to come in the 15-30 range. If I were the Swans I’d be asking for for 3 and F1 in exchange for Warner bros and 17 assuming ladder positions remain. I think Clarke is likely to agree to that provided Sheldrick is included, who would be a player our game style would target.
 
Noah Chamberlain is likely to be the first Swans NGA to attract a bid which I suspect is likely to come in the 15-30 range. If I were the Swans I’d be asking for for 3 and F1 in exchange for Warner bros and 17 assuming ladder positions remain. I think Clarke is likely to agree to that provided Sheldrick is included, who would be a player our game style would target.
So now any deal would involve Chad, Corey AND Sheldrick and a 1st round pick going back?
 
So now any deal would involve Chad, Corey AND Sheldrick and a 1st round pick going back?
Corey will leave with Chad yes but holds almost zero value in terms of trade. You’d be getting pick 3 and another likely top 5 pick the following year so yes that’s correct. Pick 3 and 2026 pick 3-5 for Warner and 17 with two reserves players is not unreasonable.
 
Corey will leave with Chad yes but holds almost zero value in terms of trade. You’d be getting pick 3 and another likely top 5 pick the following year so yes that’s correct. Pick 3 and 2026 pick 3-5 for Warner and 17 with two reserves players is not unreasonable.
Corey I understand. Has Sheldrick indicated that he wants to leave at the end of 2025?
 
Corey I understand. Has Sheldrick indicated that he wants to leave at the end of 2025?
Not that I’m aware of but GTG has answered that succinctly.
He is too good to not get game time at afl level .
If swans don't play him i can see him leaving .
Would west coast want him ? We seem to have drafted a lot of inside mid lately so maybe not
I think we will continue drafting inside mids, it would appear that kicking skills and an outside game are merely a bonus to what we’re after. Sheldrick fits the mould perfectly in a great age bracket. We’ll ask the question.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Speculation Chad Warner

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top