Speculation Chad Warner

[rye]

If they are moving home and will be compensated in other ways.
it’s not fanciful look at Geelong.

living around your family is a lot cheaper especially if you have kids

family will get help finding better employment if required.

Property prices could be less so you don’t need as much

There’s lots of reasons to not be naive to think a salary that is only ever speculated on is the final dollar and cent in the game of life.

find me an example of someone under contract moving to geelong and agreeing to a contract with additional years for the same pay they were already owed.

ill wait.

honestly do you not realise how ridiculous you sound?

 

[RonnieRaven]

find me an example of someone under contract moving to geelong and agreeing to a contract with additional years for the same pay they were already owed.

ill wait.

honestly do you not realise how ridiculous you sound?

that fella they got for pick 7 off the top of my head
Jack from the suns

 

[King Huskii]

that fella they got for pick 7 off the top of my head
Jack from the suns

Facts

find me an example of someone under contract moving to geelong and agreeing to a contract with additional years for the same pay they were already owed.

ill wait.

honestly do you not realise how ridiculous you sound?

Chill dude

 

[rye]

that fella they got for pick 7 off the top of my head
Jack from the suns

he took additional money over additional years which was then smoothed.

 

[RonnieRaven]

he took additional money over additional years which was then smoothed.

I don’t research but that sounds wrong.
My point was I know many of people that take a hair cut to move close to their family.
I’m only disputing that it’s laughable because it happens all the time in the real world so unless afl players are cyborgs I suspect a few of the 700+ listed players would have similar rationale.
You might be new age where money is life and if you don’t have tons of it you got no life.
That is not true

 

[briztoon]

that fella they got for pick 7 off the top of my head
Jack from the suns

Nope. Geelong extended his contract, at less per season, but with a higher total over the length of his contract.

That’s how every other contract that has been smoothed out has worked.

 

[briztoon]

I don’t research but that sounds wrong.

 

[WCE777]

You didn’t stipulate any specifics in your previous post, you just threw out a blanket statement.

That’s exactly what Richmond did with Dusty’s last contract in 2017. Reportedly $1.3m per over 7 years, when the 2018 salary cap was $12.4m.

So Dusty took up 10% of Richmond’s salary cap.


Pretty sure Buddy’s contract at Sydney would have been around 10%+ of Sydney’s salary cap when he moved there.


In 2027 the salary cap will be $18.4m. Even if the Eagles get Warner from Sydney, they should easily be able to pay Harley $2m in 2028.

You will need to pony up 2 million for wonder boy Harley Reid otherwise another club will.

again no player is worth $2M per season.
Which player are you paying this in your team?

 

[Grumpyshades]

again no player is worth $2M per season.
Which player are you paying this in your team?

well they paid Lobb 900k per season..on that scale Harley is worth 10mill

 

[King Huskii]

again no player is worth $2M per season.
Which player are you paying this in your team?

Good God you are a tripper

 

[King Huskii]

well they paid Lobb 900k per season..on that scale Harley is worth 10mill

Sucked in

 

[WilloTree]

well they paid Lobb 900k per season..on that scale Harley is worth 10mill

oops. Might have got that one worng mate...by about 200k

Glad you don't do my tax.

 

[Rich01]

Reckon he’ll end up at West Coast.

Sydney will begrudgingly accept WC 1st and Haw 1st.

They need to show Harley they are serious about getting him good support around the ball.

 

[Get_The_Gaff]

Reckon he’ll end up at West Coast.

Sydney will begrudgingly accept WC 1st and Haw 1st.

They need to show Harley they are serious about getting him good support around the ball.

Considering Richmond paid 12 + 19 for a 24 year old taranto why should wce pay potentially pick 3 + 14 for warner ?

Seems to be a hell of a lot more for a very similar player at the same age

 

[King Huskii]

Considering Richmond paid 12 + 19 for a 24 year old taranto why should wce pay potentially pick 3 + 14 for warner ?

Seems to be a hell of a lot more for a very similar player at the same age

Warner is far better than Taranto

 

[Get_The_Gaff]

Warner is far better than Taranto

Is he far better than luke Jackson when traded ?

Jackson was the next Natanui and supposed best young tall in the comp when he went to freo

 

[King Huskii]

Is he far better than luke Jackson when traded ?

Jackson was the next Natanui and supposed best young tall in the comp when he went to freo

And?

 

[Grumpyshades]

Is he far better than luke Jackson when traded ?

Jackson was the next Natanui and supposed best young tall in the comp when he went to freo

Jackson is an absolute potato

 

[Dockeroo]

Is he far better than luke Jackson when traded ?

Jackson was the next Natanui and supposed best young tall in the comp when he went to freo

Well they are from the same draft.
Jackson was traded mostly on potential, 3 seasons into his career aged 21.

Warner will be 6 years in next October and a proven commodity, aged 24.

I reckon myself 24 years old is the peak value of a tradeable AFL player.

Its the perfect intersection point between being as certain as you can be that the player is proven at the highest level, and also confident that you can get 8 or 9 years from 24-32 years of age where they player is basically playing at their peak.

Its no coincidence that Chris Judd the most expensive trade ever, was also 24 years old and 6 seasons in when he left WCE.

 

[Get_The_Gaff]

And?

What did you trade for him ?

 

[Get_The_Gaff]

Well they are from the same draft.
Jackson was traded mostly on potential, 3 seasons into his career aged 21.

Warner will be 6 years in next October and a proven commodity, aged 24.

I reckon myself 24 years old is the peak value of a tradeable AFL player.

Its the perfect intersection point between being as certain as you can be that the player is proven at the highest level, and also confident that you can get 8 or 9 years from 24-32 years of age where they player is basically playing at their peak.

Its no coincidence that Chris Judd the most expensive trade ever, was also 24 years old and 6 seasons in when he left WCE.

Jackson was pick 3 and showed he was the best young tall in the league .

At 21 he had shown he was very good and still has 10 years left when traded

Judd was the biggest trade ever because he was the best player ever traded

 

[Get_The_Gaff]

Jackson is an absolute potato

Rubbish

 

[Dockeroo]

Jackson was pick 3 and showed he was the best young tall in the league .

At 21 he had shown he was very good and still has 10 years left when traded

Judd was the biggest trade ever because he was the best player ever traded

Yea but he was also at his maximum peak value. If he’d been 26 and eight years into his career he would have cost Carlton a bit less in a trade. That would be 2 less years of high quality football they would be buying.
Luke Jackson was 21 and didn’t have the runs on the board that Warner has at 24.
Fremantle bought Jackson on the basis of what he could develop into.

A club buying Chad Warner is not waiting for any development. He’s an AA level player from the first day he walks in the door of his new club. There’s no more developing to do.

You pay a premium for that luxury.

 

[CaseySibosadoHOF]

Jackson is an absolute potato

If you can be a potato while stacking up the individual honours he already has while being younger than some BigFooty accounts, then Tony Galati is gonna be a premiership winning coach soon.

 

[Get_The_Gaff]

Warner is far better than Taranto

Taranto won the giants BnF in a grand final year . He was also surrounded by some the best talent in the league.

Warner is very good but is probably the 3rd best midfielder at Sydney behind heeney and gulden