Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
Last edited:
Analysis Champion data rates every club list
- Thread starter Groupie_
- Start date
- Tagged users None
exceptional design
Club Legend
- Oct 13, 2012
- 1,803
- 4,990
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Can't access. anyone feel like a copy & paste?
- Jul 15, 2014
- 23,263
- 45,186
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, LA Lakers, Western United
Yeah that makes sense from what our list has shown last year. Can improve on that a lot next year though
Hot tigers
All Australian
- Nov 5, 2014
- 897
- 2,098
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Saw this yesterday, we need more depth and we would shoot up that list
Was about to take that seriously then I saw that St Kilda, Melb, port and Coll are ranked above the Hawks and cats LOL.
As for us, I counted 5 elite not 3.
rfctigerarmy
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
Tiger_Of_Old
THE_GUN:"Why don't you use your reg acc"7/9/24
Going to say HTF do they rate Collingwood 7th?lolcoll in 7th is hilarious
dud list
Eddie must have a pie in CD.
Five? Rance, Martin, Cotchin & then who? Jack at his best maybe but that hasn't been seen now for a couple of years, Caddy & Prestia yet to run out for us and neither have proven to be elite at past clubs.
- Feb 16, 2012
- 5,894
- 10,914
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Portland Trailblazers
Bottom 5 looks about right and top 5 isn't bad. The middle is a laughable mess.
turtle27
2017 🏆 2019 🏆 2020 🏆
- Oct 5, 2004
- 6,408
- 8,644
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Rochester, Broncos, Pens
exceptional design
Club Legend
- Oct 13, 2012
- 1,803
- 4,990
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Thanks for putting that up.
It would be interesting to see how the dogs, us, GWS were rated at the end of 2014.
To me it says more about the way a team plays.
If you play a winning game style, you will have more players be considered as elite, rather than the quality of the individual players.
- Feb 16, 2012
- 5,894
- 10,914
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Portland Trailblazers
Wait...what? That's how they worked this list out? Aren't Champion Data the campaigners who do all the AFL stats and then don't share them with the general public? And they use all that data to come up with this? Haha...**** me.
- Feb 16, 2012
- 5,894
- 10,914
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Portland Trailblazers
So 4 elite players and 10 good players (Adelaide) beats 6 elite players and 7 good players (Sydney). Because 4+10=14 and 6+7=13 and 14>13. Good one Champion Data you little ****ing champions of data, you.
- Apr 27, 2014
- 32,462
- 63,521
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- The Fanbois Farters
Well we needed champion data to tell us this?????
turtle27
2017 🏆 2019 🏆 2020 🏆
- Oct 5, 2004
- 6,408
- 8,644
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Rochester, Broncos, Pens
Correct, you might recall they labelled Sheds as elite, but qualified it as elite in his position. He didn't have a great year, so I assume he's dropped of the list.
Would love to k now who the 3rd elite is, given Rance and Dusty would be the first two. Cotch or Jack?
- Feb 16, 2012
- 5,894
- 10,914
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Portland Trailblazers
Would have to be Cotch based on last season (although I would say both are clearly elite).
Neither. It's obviously Astbury!
Norf has an elite player?????????
Oh Goldstein.
Oh Goldstein.
Last edited:
- Jul 14, 2015
- 1,613
- 2,802
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Pats|Liverpool|Bayern|AFC Wimbledon
Who the **** are the 4 Bulldogs elite players other than the Bont and Wood?
Dahlhaus? Libba? Boyd? Stretching it there Champion Data.
Dahlhaus? Libba? Boyd? Stretching it there Champion Data.
- Jul 14, 2015
- 1,613
- 2,802
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Pats|Liverpool|Bayern|AFC Wimbledon
Goldstein.
- Feb 16, 2012
- 5,894
- 10,914
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Portland Trailblazers
Actually, even dumber than that...Melbourne above Hawthorn when both have a score of 10. But Melbourne's is 2 elite plus 8 good and Hawthorn is 5 of each. How does that make any sense?
Even if you can accept their designations and the stupidly simple method of ranking teams that they have come up with, there are still logical problems with it. Why is this even a thing.
