- Sep 26, 2012
- 36,396
- 56,244
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
In: Bobby, Frampton
Out: Lipinski, Cox
Sub:WHE
Out: Lipinski, Cox
Sub:WHE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can only have one.How can Adam's and Mitchell get Games when they are s**t Kicks?
Frampton (whom I like) is sadly no good at all as a forward. We are better off letting him slow brew in the position we recruited him for as a backman. Would much much prefer McStay rucked with AJ playing, or Kreuger getting a call up.We cannot go into a finals campaign with McStay or AJ as the second ruck. That would be diabolical. If Cox has to go (even temporarily) then Frampton should be the replacement.
I don't remember this. He gave away 1 free on the night, so it's possible. I do remember the one Cox gave away to Curnow for his first free goal. So, tall but lacking in strength rucks are also prone to this, I guess.McStay gave away a free infringing in the ruck inside their forward 50 arc just as I predicted. It happens whenever undersized non rucks are asked to do the job and it can be a very dangerous ploy given the way smaller men infringe at throw ins and ball ups.
Me
Out: Markov, Cox
In: Hill, Johnson
Sub: Lipinski
Markov is okay but he doesn’t get close to what Nick Daicos was producing at half back. Move Nick back there because he had little impact in the midfield tonight.
Don't think Noble's under any pressure from Markov. 22 touches and 7 tackles, he was fine tonight.Markov had just about his best game offensively at Collingwood. Not as good defensively as he has been but if we’re moving Daicos back to HB, Noble’s the one under pressure imho. He’s had a few poor weeks.
Agree.Markov had just about his best game offensively at Collingwood. Not as good defensively as he has been but if we’re moving Daicos back to HB, Noble’s the one under pressure imho. He’s had a few poor weeks.
Yep.With how poor he's been as a defender, it would be negligent to not look at it. His complete lack of run and inability to effect marking contests killed us with him in the defensive half.
I don't remember this. He gave away 1 free on the night, so it's possible. I do remember the one Cox gave away to Curnow for his first free goal. So, tall but lacking in strength rucks are also prone to this, I guess.
Don't think Noble's under any pressure from Markov. 22 touches and 7 tackles, he was fine tonight.
In your dreams is the only place Noble would be under pressure.Markov had just about his best game offensively at Collingwood. Not as good defensively as he has been but if we’re moving Daicos back to HB, Noble’s the one under pressure imho. He’s had a few poor weeks.
"Grabbed" arm.Was outside their F50 for blocking DeKoning. From memory, his kick inside F50 resulted in the free to Curnow because Moore grabbed arm.
Just 2 clangers.Doesn’t matter how many possessions he gets when his ball use is as bad as it was tonight.
Just 2 clangers.
In your dreams is the only place Noble would be under pressure.
I don't think we need to throw everything out, but Cox and Lipinski were two of our worst over a two week period, so based on that they would have to be under threat.
If Lipinski is going to play so outside and with zero physicality then he needs to not fumble and he needs to use the ball really well. He is fumbling and using the ball poorly at the moment. I think bringing him in without VFL form was a mistake. Go let him have 35 in the VFL and get his touch back.
Naicos is a superstar but I think the full time midfield move and being tagged has also exhausted him. He was poor last night and short stepped way too many contests. Asking too much of a second year, lightly framed player. I'd like him to play all over the ground, but to start forward next week.
Out: Cox, Lipinski
In: Hill, Frampton
Howe forward, Crisp mid. Daicos forward. Pendles sub.
Def: Moore, Frampton, Murphy, Quaynor, Maynard, Noble, Markov
Mid: Cameron, DeGoey, Adams, Mitchell, Crisp, Sidebottom, Jaicos
Fwd: McStay, Mihocek, Howe, Elliott, McReery, Hill, Naicos, WHE
Sub: Pendles
This is the exact reason why I don’t see AJ as the second ruck replacement to cox,McStay gave away a free infringing in the ruck inside their forward 50 arc just as I predicted. It happens whenever undersized non rucks are asked to do the job and it can be a very dangerous ploy given the way smaller men infringe at throw ins and ball ups.