Tom Campbell likes this and waves from sunny North Melbourne. Free BTC Free BJS.Was confident I'd see a post today about sweet debuting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tom Campbell likes this and waves from sunny North Melbourne. Free BTC Free BJS.Was confident I'd see a post today about sweet debuting
Was confident I'd see a post today about sweet debuting
Unfortunately not they were planning to go back to that for this week considering it's a more traditional format round but decided to stick with naming teams the night beforeAre teams back to normal as being named on Thursdays now?
Tim has got through training fine apparently, along with Crozier. So should be a reasonable team named, hopefully its balanced.Was confident I'd see a post today about sweet debuting
Crozier returning will be massive. Have to think Roarke gets dropped this week, which is unlucky given he actually played reasonably well (for a depth player)Tim has got through training fine apparently, along with Crozier. So should be a reasonable team named, hopefully its balanced.
Sounds to me that you are saying no excuses this week for not putting the best team on the park.Sounds like all of English, JJ, Bruce, Croizer & Vandermeer will be available for selection.
Will make for interesting team selection given all are probably in our best 22, coming off a big win.
Crozier returning will be massive. Have to think Roarke gets dropped this week, which is unlucky given he actually played reasonably well (for a depth player)
we can't forget Suckling.
Even Bevo mentioned him as one of the players missing recently.
I think its still worth persisting with him in the high half forward role. As long as some other forwards really improve with the pressure game. If that doesn't work he can drift through defense and the wing roles no worries.
I have a feeling the club will go all out... we will want to have an experienced team leading up to the Geelong and West Coast game.
IN: Suckling, JJ, Bruce, Crozier, Vandermeer (565 games experience)
Out: R.Smith, West, Lloyd, Cavara, Gardner (122 games experience)
bet result = + 443 games experience heading into the crunch part of the season... Go dogs!
I could definitely be wrong, but I didn't see Roarke lose a single 1v1 all game, and he had some pretty high impact plays including spoiling the ball when outnumbered and getting into a Dogs player's hands. I don't think he'll ever be a best 22 player, but I'm happy having him as a depth defenderI'd keep Roarke over Gardy...stuff the height difference
I could definitely be wrong, but I didn't see Roarke lose a single 1v1 all game, and he had some pretty high impact plays including spoiling the ball when outnumbered and getting into a Dogs player's hands. I don't think he'll ever be a best 22 player, but I'm happy having him as a depth defender
Suckling needs a scratch match imo. Especially with his age and his hammys.
Keep Cavarra. Deserves another shot. Him and Vandermeer add the forward line pace we need.
My guesses are
Ins
JJ, Crozier, Vandermeer, Bruce
Outs
R.Smith, West, LLoyd, Lipinski
Going by recent history Lipinski or McLean will be dropped again. They don't deserve to but the squeeze will happen.
Gardiner won't be. Don't think we go in with one key defender.
It would be a interesting call to keep in 2 Gamer Cavarra over someone like Lipinksi (who is underrated for his score assistance ability)
Mark my words, the club is doing all they can to get the kids from the 16 (lipinski + English), 17 (Richards + Naughton) and 18 draft (Smith and Vandermeer) into that 50 games plus experience region ASAP. We will be much better for it, since all those kids mentioned have very high ceilings.
I tend to agree with Gardner, i think we need him for structure.. but with Crozier coming in i'm not too sure we need him against melbourne.
I would too, but the club is desperate for that pressure forward. Lipinski isn't that type of player. I think they will give Cavarra a decent shot at trying to nail down that position.
Lipinski or McLean could get super unlucky. And obviously if we could I'd simply remove gardiner and play one key defender but I'm a huge believer in the 5 tall structure across the park.
I personally expect both to be omissions this week.I'd keep Roarke over Gardy...stuff the height difference
I wouldn't describe Lipinski's ceiling as "very high". Vandermeer has already gone past himin about 10 games. Not sure about Richards either but I have higher expectations of him than I have of Lipinski.It would be a interesting call to keep in 2 Gamer Cavarra over someone like Lipinksi (who is underrated for his score assistance ability)
Mark my words, the club is doing all they can to get the kids from the 16 (lipinski + English), 17 (Richards + Naughton) and 18 draft (Smith and Vandermeer) into that 50 games plus experience region ASAP. We will be much better for it, since all those kids mentioned have very high ceilings.
I tend to agree with Gardner, i think we need him for structure.. but with Crozier coming in i'm not too sure we need him against melbourne.
Do we though? I'm not sure that in the contests he actually gets to he provides a worthwhile contest. He didn't have as many clanger last week but he also seemed to have as much direction as a cork in the ocean and looked to be nowhere near where he needed to be many times. I could be wrong.It would be a interesting call to keep in 2 Gamer Cavarra over someone like Lipinksi (who is underrated for his score assistance ability)
Mark my words, the club is doing all they can to get the kids from the 16 (lipinski + English), 17 (Richards + Naughton) and 18 draft (Smith and Vandermeer) into that 50 games plus experience region ASAP. We will be much better for it, since all those kids mentioned have very high ceilings.
I tend to agree with Gardner, i think we need him for structure.. but with Crozier coming in i'm not too sure we need him against melbourne.
I like Lippi's skill and all that but you can just sense in a final he'd be the guy with 3 possessions and little impact.I wouldn't describe Lipinski's ceiling as "very high". Vandermeer has already gone past himin about 10 games. Not sure about Richards either but I have higher expectations of him than I have of Lipinski.
No argument with Lipinski getting a game most weeks. He's thereabouts, and on his day can be handy.
I wouldn't describe Lipinski's ceiling as "very high". Vandermeer has already gone past himin about 10 games. Not sure about Richards either but I have higher expectations of him than I have of Lipinski.
No argument with Lipinski getting a game most weeks. He's thereabouts, and on his day can be handy.
I might be wrong but I thought he punched the aerial ball a fair bit last week (I was only just game enough to watch through splayed fingers when it went near him). He has averaged 5.5 one-percenters this year. By comparison Keath has averaged 4.5 this year and a bit over 5 for his whole career.Do we though? I'm not sure that in the contests he actually gets to he provides a worthwhile contest. He didn't have as many clanger last week but he also seemed to have as much direction as a cork in the ocean and looked to be nowhere near where he needed to be many times. I could be wrong.