Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Moving on from North …
… would GWS be incentivised to bid on Daicos at pick 2 to help their later pick position? For example, GWS are currently holding pick 53. The earlier Daicos and Darcy are called out, the better that pick 53 becomes. Best case for GWS they call out Darcy at 2 and Daicos at 3, and their pick 53 would become a pick around 45. If Daicos and Darcy go later, then their pick 53 might be closer to pick 49 or 48.
Tohill has gone home to study medicine.IMO what would be a successful trade and draft period:
In
1. Daicos ☑
2. Dib
3. Lipinski
4. Krueger ☑
5. Arthur Jones (178 cm) WA
Rookie
6. Michael Gibbons (176 cm) Carlton
Out
1. Mayne ☑
2. Greenwood ☑
3. Cox
4. Thomas
5. Madge
Rookie
6. Tohill
Would love it if the club some how got back into the first round and nabbed Wanganeen-Milera, exceptional talent!
Yikes is right. For Hill?Future first? Yikes.
Which big money players are changing teams? So far it's literally just been Cerra. It's not as if big money players are being exchanged a lot this season, so I would like to know how you're gauging our cap to be bursting.
C’mon Jetta. Give Bobby a call.
I’d pay a future first.
Plenty unsigned currently that we can delist.
Didn’t you report someone for being abusive the other day?WITH FKIN WHAT??????????
C9 saying Essendrugs & Pies sniffing around - will cost a future 1st but would do that for sure.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
For a player who averages 10 games a year and was taken in the 20’s? No. Pick 27 should get the deal done.
14 goals for 17 games doesn't scream the quality people are making out. But he is young, talented and can kick a screamer for sure.
It'd make sense in terms of the pick swap for 27 us and Richmond were supposedly discussing. It seemed like a strange one for us, but that would have been a ripper deal if that rule is correct. unplugged's dream of owning all the picks in the 40s would rock if that's the rule.I think I have got it right.. Happy to be corrected an educated, but otherwise, we will see what happens in late November.
That is the reason we ask for and get picks 78 and 79 in trades. Otherwise, just forgo them….
C9 saying Essendrugs & Pies sniffing around - will cost a future 1st but would do that for sure.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Pies have registered their interest, so obviously we can fit him in.We have to re-sign a bunch of them, and they're salaries are already included because we know we need to sign them.
C’mon Jetta. Give Bobby a call.
I’d pay a future first for their second.
C9 saying Essendrugs & Pies sniffing around - will cost a future 1st but would do that for sure.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
You can tick all you likeWhy would it be surely? We more than most have zero reason to be interested in any of them.
Tight cap? Tick.
In rebuilding mode? Tick.
Not contending for top 4 in the next 3-4 years minimum? Tick.
Acquiring a late-20's player on decent coin is something a finals / flag contender does, not a rebuilding team.
I doubt he is on much. He hasn't exactly set the game on fire. Still has a long way to go. But obviously has some talent.Pies have registered their interest, so obviously we can fit him in.
Maybe Melbournes future first, but even then you'd want something back.Yikes is right. For Hill?
future first!!!
no no no no no no